Sexual PsyOps - How the government implements a hypnotic need to hedonist life, promoting alienated society

Looking Back: Sex in psychological warfare

https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-22/edition-1/looking-back-sex-psychological-warfare

All the major combatants involved in World War II used pornography as a small part of their psychological operations (PSYOP) strategy. Mostly this involved dropping propaganda leaflets using sexual themes from the air, in an attempt to demoralise enemy soldiers at the front. These materials are now collected avidly by historians, and they are also an important source for those of us interested in the role of psychology in crucial parts of human history. Why were they used? Did they work?

Why were they used?

In his book Psychological Warfare (Infantry Journal Press, Washington, DC, 1948), Professor Paul Linebarger wrote:

Young human beings, especially young males, are apt to give considerable attention to sex. In areas of military operations, they are removed from the stimuli of secondary sex references, which are (in America) an accepted part of everyone’s daily life: bathing beauty photos, magazine covers, semi-nudes in advertising, etc. Our enemies tried to use the resulting pin-up craze for propaganda purposes, hoping that a vain arousal of oestrum would diminish morale.

In German Psychological Warfare (Arno Press, New York, 1972) Ladislas Farago states ‘Since young soldiers are in a state of hyperactive bodily development, their immediate problems are related to appetite and sex.’ He adds that ‘sexual deprivation may be a motive for a soldier’s suicide attempt’.

The Japanese attitude towards this subject is mentioned by Lieutenant Colonel Mahmood Kan Durrani in The Sixth Column (Cassell and Co., 1955). He was a prisoner of the Japanese and quotes a lecture given by a Japanese officer on how leaflets should be prepared. One of his six recommendations was: The leaflet should have, if possible, the picture of a beautiful woman, after the method used by the Germans in the First World War. This device would insure that the soldier would be attracted and would be unable to resist looking at the picture over and over again. This would rouse his passion, and his heart would be inclined for love and to hate fighting.

There is in fact some backing for the ploy from psychological research. For example, Edward Donnerstein says in the Journal of Personality and Social Behavior (Vol. 39, 1980, pp.269–77): ‘…the present results suggest that highly arousing nonaggressive-erotic stimuli can be a mediator of aggressive behavior by males toward other males under certain conditions.’

As well as attempting to sap motivation, leaflets were often used to drive wedges between allies. The Germans loved ‘divide and conquer’ themes, attempting to sour relations between the American and British troops, soldiers and civilian ‘slackers’ at home, Christians and Jews, and even African-Americans and Caucasians. Sefton Delmer, a reporter with the French Army who would later become an official of the British wartime propaganda agency, recalls his visit to the French front in 1939. He was shown a leaflet ‘which consisted of a small picture on a thin piece of paper showing a French soldier doing his duty at the front. However, if one held the picture to the light, the scene underwent a complete change. In place of the Brave poilu one now saw in minute salacious detail, a British Tommy fornicating with what the caption told us was the Frenchman’s fiancée.’

To the British forces, anti-American leaflets attempted to drive a wedge between the allied forces, playing on the ‘over-sexed, overpaid and over here’ reputation of the American troops. One example of this type of leaflet shows an American sergeant in bed with a British girl, and the words ‘You Americans are so different’. On the reverse is a brief message stating ‘The Yanks are putting up their tents in merry old England. They've got lots of money and loads of time to chase after your women’.

The Germans also tried to take advantage of the alleged latent anti-Semitic feelings of the Allies. One item dropped during the early stages of the war shows a nude blonde holding a copy of the Times. She is wearing a British Army helmet and looking into a full-length mirror. Her image, as shown in the mirror, is that of a dark-haired, obviously Jewish woman. She is in an ape-like crouched position with a sinister smirk on her face. In her hand, the image of the  newspaper is reversed and now reads Semit in the mirror. This is a very imaginative piece of propaganda. It has a sexual image and yet sends the message that the British are fighting the war for the Jews.

Towards the end of the war in late 1944 and early 1945, the Germans became more desperate. The leaflets became more pornographic in a last-ditch attempt to somehow slow the Allied forces. Messages focus on what the troops are missing at home:

At first she tried very hard to remain faithful but she lost this battle against herself as thousands of wives and girls back home did before her. It all started with an evening out, with going to the movies and to some bar, but soon it became real love. Only by the picture at her side she is occasionally reminded of her husband who is – for months now – somewhere in Western Europe, fighting a stubborn enemy, freezing and suffering in a muddy foxhole. But as time passes she thinks of him more and more seldom. Now she does not even turn his picture to the wall when another man is staying with her and holding her in his arms.

One Japanese leaflet used against the Americans in the Philippine Islands was simple and tasteful. It depicts a beautiful woman’s lips and the word ‘Remember?’ The back is in the form of a handwritten note, saying: ‘Darling, can’t you find a way to come back to me? I miss you so. I send all my love, and my kisses are on the other side of this card.’

The British government also authorised the manufacture of a very few pornographic leaflets during World War II. There are three different items known to have been printed, including one of Hitler holding his circumcised penis, probably designed to feed the rumour that Hitler was indeed a self-hating Jew. The British leaflets were discussed in some detail by one of the major British wartime propagandists, Sefton Delmer, in an article – ‘H.M.G.’s Secret Pornographer’ – published in the Times Literacy Supplement of 21 January 1972. Delmer reported that his cloak-and-dagger friends in the Special Operations Executive (SOE) were constantly clamoring for printed pornography. But I still took the same view of printing pornography as I had in France in 1939. Looking back, I do not think my unit produced more than three items of printed pornography during the whole of the war, not because I was squeamish, but simply because I did not think the effort involved on our part would be justified by the subversive effect on the Germans.

Did they work?

So did soldiers finding the leaflets become emotionally crippled and unable to carry on their duties and responsibilities? No, in fact just the opposite occurred. The ‘pin-up’ pictures became collectors’ items sought after by the troops who greedily collected and swapped them. If anything, the leaflets raised morale. There is no doubt that they were the most heartily appreciated propaganda leaflets used in World War II. We can probably state that they were the most widely read and circulated enemy documents of any war.

We know this from the letters troops sent home, and subsequent historical accounts. For example, in Beyond the Beachhead: The 29th Infantry Division in Normandy, (Joseph Balkoski, Stackpole Books, Mechanicsburg, PA, 1989):

The enemy’s leaflets were nothing more than appeals to the American soldier’s sexual instincts. A typical leaflet featured a sketch of an attractive and scantily clad woman in the arms of a happy male civilian. The caption asked what the G.I.’s thought they would be doing if they were home instead of in the army. The 29ers chuckled and hoped the Germans would send more over the lines. The leaflets were a lot safer than real artillery shells, and the sketches were fairly interesting.

The same sort of things was happening on the Japanese front where sex leaflets were being dropped by the enemy on Allied troops. Some comments on the subject from Prisoners of the Japanese (Gavan Daws, William Morrow & Co., New York, 1994):

The Japanese were dropping propaganda leaflets… And for the friendliest of friendly persuasion, pictures of a beautiful blonde stripper, private parts and all: ‘You too can enjoy this if you surrender.’ The propaganda bombers came droning over every day.  It was like having the paper delivered. Some of the troops started trading the leaflets like baseball cards.

One American soldier assigned to the 35th Infantry Division in February 1945 recalled receiving pornographic leaflets in an artillery barrage. He told me ‘we used the leaflets for toilet paper’. This seems to bolster a comment once made by Sir Arthur Harris, Air Marshall of the Royal Air Force during World War II: ‘My personal opinion is that the only thing achieved (by dropping leaflets) was largely to supply the continent’s requirement of toilet paper for the five long years of the war.’

It could be that the leaflets had other positive impacts. I once interviewed the top British forger of the war, and he said that the leaflets ‘did nothing to the enemy, but they were popular among the “adolescents” working for me. They did not demoralise the enemy, but they were excellent for the morale of the British agents who handled and distributed them.’

An American propagandist once told me that he did not like to disapprove these strange and exotic concepts because it tended to stifle the creativity of his artists. It seems that on the Allied side at least, sex leaflets were produced mostly because the bosses thought it was a good way for their people to stretch their imaginations and remain creative.

But perhaps these imaginations were not stretched far enough: some examples show how a lack of knowledge of thpsychology and cultural values could hinder attempts to get inside the mind of the enemy. For example, in his thesis on the use of propaganda in the Vietnam War, Midshipman Jason Thomas Chaput says:

Other messages such as those of the sex appeal leaflets acted to turn the reader off to entertaining the idea of the Chieu Hoi program because they were anchored in American values and not those of the Vietnamese. The sex appeal propaganda which depicted bikini-clad, over endowed Vietnamese women stated that the soldier could find true happiness and the satisfactions of life which every man was entitled if he chose to rally to one of the program’s centers. The individuals drafting the propaganda mistakenly believed that Vietnamese soldiers saw the world through the same masculine goggles as did American GI’s. The U.S. advisors failed to understand that the Confucian ideals held by a majority of the Vietnamese directed them to be in harmony with their environment by adopting a middle path in all areas of conduct. The effect of the sex appeal leaflets was to turn off the Vietnamese by solidifying their views that the corrupt outside Western influence present in their countr had to be defeated.

Of course, the leaflets may also have succeeded in their negative intentions, particularly those not directly related to the pornographic message. Despite official denial that the United States of America ever engaged in sexual propaganda, some extremely explicit and pornographic items have been discovered in wartime files and scrapbooks of the Office of Strategic Services. They feature themes of homosexuality, bestiality, lesbianism and child molestation. I spoke to the author of these leaflets many years after the war, and he was quite proud of them. He told me: ‘The six Bilder [pictures] were not just idle pornography. The “fun” part served, as you rightly observed, to achieve wide and rapid dissemination of the material, which was not designed simply to stimulate raging hormones. Its purpose was to stimulate second thoughts – a nagging suspicion and discomfort as to the possibility of actual events, even though depicted in pornographic caricature. Could it be that my young son is being corrupted and violated by his Hitlerjugend fuehrer? Is my wife’s yearning for sexual fulfillment satisfied by a surrogate, perhaps a neighbour’s dog?’

A more direct approach

So it appears that using sexual themes in an attempt to demoralise the enemy is a largely unsuccessful strategy. Instead of becoming emotionally crippled and unable to carry out their duties, ‘pin-up’ pictures become collector’s items and often have the effect of raising morale. But there are examples of more direct effects of sexual propaganda on the enemy. John L. Plaster tells of an unauthorised ‘black’ use of sex by America’s secret soldiers in SOG: The Secret Wars of America’s Commandos in Vietnam (Simon & Schuster, New York, 1997). He says: But the most mind-blowing dirty trick I ever saw was conceived by my good friend Floyd ‘Pigpen’ Ambrose. He went all the way to Bangkok to have a printed poster of his own design, showing a nude, large-breasted Asian woman, which he’d tack on trees beside major enemy trails. Imagine the shock of an NVA soldier, raised under a straitlaced Communist orthodoxy that prohibited pornography, who came upon Floyd’s poster – not to mention the provocative headline, which boldly asked in Vietnamese, ‘Who’s sleeping with your wife, and has she got jugs like these?’ As the message grew more inflammatory, the print became smaller, luring the engrossed soldier closer – and closer – and he’d forget caution and step on the small mine Floyd had planted and lose a foot.’

For a much more comprehensive account, see www.psywarrior.com/sexandprop.html

Herbert A. Friedman is a retired Sergeant Major now living on Long Island, NY, where he continues to research and write on psychological operations sgmbert@hotmail.com

IMMORALITY PSYOP – REV 9:21 – ATTACK ON WESTERN SOCIETY

https://prophecyforyouth.com/immorality-psyop-rev-9-attack-society/

Pornography is an immorality psyop. It is rife on the Internet, but, even though it includes child sexual abuse, it is not removed. Facial recognition software can identify any human facial image posted, but something as harmful as pornography can’t be banned? It all sounds like a sick joke and perhaps it is – but much more than that. Pornography is a psyop (psychological warfare operation) to undermine Judaeo-Christian civilization.

WELL BEFORE THE INTERNET

Such immorality psyops have been used for hundreds of years, and pornography is not removed from the Net as it is part of the latest attack. People have always been attacked by slander and innuendo, but the first organized immorality psyop happened during the French Revolution (1789 – 1799). Filthy artwork depicting Marie Antoinette was distributed to the people. The characters in the artwork also included foreign dignitaries, possible enemies to France, so treason was also implied. The average person had seen nothing like this before and it helped turn the French population against their queen. This, along with the other measures taken by the Jacobin secret societies, brought about the Revolution.

EUROPEAN ROYALTY ATTACKED

It is said that Britain was behind the French Revolution, but the later Russian Bolshevik Revolution (1917) was engineered by bankers, the forerunners of today’s globalist elite. They attacked the tsarina, Alexandra Feodorovna, Empress of Russia, and her four daughters, in pornographic artwork, distributed to the mostly uneducated Russian peasants.

FROM RUSSIA – WITHOUT LOVE

The tsarina was also attacked due to the royal family’s consultations with the Orthodox monk, Rasputin, regarding the seriously ill heir to the throne. It seemed that the monk could cure this boy, who was born a hemophiliac, but, like all fake healings, there was no permanent recovery. There is no evidence of any immorality having taken place between the tsarina and the mystic, but Rasputin did influence the tsar politically. Sadly, the royal family accepted non-biblical prophetic and ‘miracle-working’ legends associated with the Russian Orthodox Church.

The next attack on the West came through Communist agents during the ‘Cold War’ period. As all the Communist states are creations of the elite globalist bankers, it is really not surprising. Major criminal organizations also played a part as, at the very top, the elite globalists control these, too, to a large degree. Paid political agents also gradually lowered the standards of censorship and legal support for Judaeo-Christian morality. In addition, false statistics are also published to weaken the population’s reasoning about the obvious dangers of sexual immorality.

IMMORALITY PSYOP = WAR WAGED AGAINST YOU

The globalists target you, as young people, because they think that your lack of life experience makes you most vulnerable. So-called ‘sex education’ is offered, but the underlying message is “break God’s Law”.

With the coming of the Internet, however, the pornographic psyop accelerated greatly. Now most people don’t have to seek out pornography; it is available in many family homes, wherever there is a computer connected up to the Internet. On a national level, along with easily available abortions, the psyop is designed to undermine biblical marriage. Fornication and adultery actually lower the birth rate, helping support the bankers’ false claims of the dire need for expanding economies. A shrinking population is the excuse for large scale immigration by cultures that are hostile to Christianity. You can see this plan being put into action right now in Europe.

On a personal level, the immorality psyop is targeted to foster discontent and anxiety, incite lust and promote ungodly behavior. The Lord Jesus Christ warns you about these sins because the end of these things is death; it is the fruit of destruction. If you want to know anything about sexual relations in marriage or about your own body, ask a doctor. Doctors study the human body in their training, dissecting bodies bequeathed to medical universities, so they really know the reality of physical relationships. But if you want to know anything about the Lord Jesus’ righteous commands, consult your Bible.

DISINFORMATION PROPAGANDA

Pornography spreads lies about the human body, including the biggest lie of all, that people will never be accountable for their sins, sexual or otherwise

. God only ever regards sexual relations as part of marriage, but when it becomes a separate issue it becomes perverse. Vanity and lies are always involved because of sinful human nature and it becomes a very destructive addition to the “pride of life”. Don’t get caught in this psyop trap – Satan’s circus of the damned, with people being demonically bound over and over again, as the scriptures warn. As someone who was saved as an adult, I can tell you that most unbelievers have to be drunk because such very personal acts are not at all natural outside the exclusivity of marriage.

VICTORIOUS WITH THE “MIND OF CHRIST”

Pornography and sexual relations outside of marriage are no answer to anything.The Scriptures are clear that these sins will increase until the Rapture of the Church and peak during the Seven-Year Tribulation. If you have fallen into any of these sins, confess this to God, or there might be future consequences.

Keep yourself pure so the Lord Jesus can use you to spread His gospel in these last days. Never allow yourself to be tempted by other young people, avoiding dangerous situations. One must flee from such sin, as Joseph did. Rasputin was taught to allow contact with such sin to build up resistance. It is a satanic falsehood – not in the Bible! Rasputin could not resist sexual sin, and his sinful practices did not protect him from his murderers.

Uncapability of veganism on argumentation

Video that a PhD Biologist is arguing with a vegan activist.

The images tilt that a vegan is feeling is a normal answer of someone who has no substances to work on neural intelligence. Veganism is promoted by shadowy psyops to uncapacitate the critical conception in reasoning and thinking.

Veganism became a religion. Became a creed, not only a lifestyle, but a spiritual believing, made to destroy hymanity on take on immunity, based on spiritual salvation and hypocrite moral conceptions.

How Pentagon can give fast answers to the security problems

This is one answer for how fast they cover information and can operate covert ops world wide, oppegning security and information fronts, while use psyops and infiltration, fake news and physical security pre-emptive operations.

PENTAGON HAS ‘OVER 800 MILITARY BASES’ ACROSS THE GLOBE WITH MORE ON THE WAY

Friends of Pontiac Tribune | May 10, 2017

https://pontiactribune.com/2017/05/pentagon-has-over-800-military-bases-across-the-globe-with-more-on-the-way/

Washington DC (Sputnik) – The United States has established hundreds of military facilities all over the globe and will only build more, President of the Brazilian Center for Solidarity and Struggle for Peace (Cebrapaz) Antonio Barreto told Sputnik Mundo, saying that overseas military bases present a threat to global peace and stability and need to be closed down.

“We, peace advocates, urge to close foreign military bases. A large-scale campaign is needed right now since we are on the verge of a major armed conflict on the Korean Peninsula which could see the use of nuclear weapons. US warships, nuclear submarines and troops are already there. They pose a threat to China, all nations in the region and the peace in the world,” he said.

Antonio Barreto criticized the United States for carrying out an interventionist foreign policy and investing millions into its overseas military presence.

“These bases present a threat to humanity. American imperialism has promoted them. Right now, the US has more than 800 military bases on all continents. The Trump administration does not intend to reduce their number. Instead they are building new ones as seen in Argentina, Colombia and other nations, primarily located in South America,” he said.

Unsurprisingly, the International Seminar has always taken place in the Cuban province of Guantanamo, a place which has become synonymous with torture and unlawful detention.

“Approximately 117 kilometers of the Guantanamo province have been occupied by a US military base, which has turned into a center for torture and horrifying violation of human rights of alleged ‘terrorists’ kept there for more than a decade,” Barreto said.

This report prepared by Sputnik

Don't foll yourself with this anti-human cult called veganism

The veganism became a kind of cult to promote an equal condition to all human beings - except plants. But in reality new philantropists and governmental psyops, promote the veganism in society by nutricionists and new enslavement of cult of body, with high level workout and no consumption of animal protein, trying to make a new aesthetic of beauty.

This cult also cultivates an anger to animal eaters, that is almost spiritual, promoting a self-proclamation of elevated spirit based on the fact of 'they do not eat living beings'. But this hipocrite form of living is adverse to the general behavior of veganism.

Veganism preaches the use of marijuana to promote a way of life, also use of other drugs. The denounce of tobaco industry by the substitution of pot, and the substitution of leather created to slaughter - not indiscriminated animal killing - to the pollution industries of plastics to create fake leather, going in against the nature.

Vegan families are against the feed of the babies with maernal milk, in substitution by syntetic milk with vegetarian properties, making the growing of babies with difficulti of motor coordination and retarding the mental age of the baby, with delaying in capability of talking and thinking.

Promotion of veganism have to do with the need of no intellectual formation of humans, with the absence of some proteins, substances needed to the cerebral formation and antibodies, absence of iron in blood and make the immunity low, creating a weak generation, with uncapability or procreation, sterility, premature aging and reduction of life expectation.

In times of Covid-19, the need of high immunity is needed, and the new generation youth is more vulnerable of these new flu.

Human Apex Pretador shows the nature of human is basic focused in fruits and meat, before the cultivate of vegetable, humans have the hunting instinct to eat, contrary to what vegans say that humans have no carnivore instinct.

Dietary news always tried to promote strange diets, like the piss diet every morning instead of water, or even feed by sunlight as it was common in the 90's.

Humans can digest vegetable, meat, even some organic derivatives - like paper for exemple - that makes humans omnivorous, not vegetarian, less vegan. PS. nor recomended to eat papers.

What if another reality of Covid-19, could it be an American Weapon

This new right, focused on bipolarization, zionism and PNAC are focused on spread news that Covid-19 is a biological weapon of China to promote economic disrupt and hegemony of Chinese market.

But, Russian specialists are telling that USA could implement this strategy of biological weapon and put this in operation in China, blaming the country for the chaos and promoting the salvation. USA can be using dialctic in praxis to give the problem, poiting the guilty and giving the solution, the economic solution, comming from Trump's administration and the Bilderberg.

About wearing no evidences, how did Sadam Hussein's regime dropped down?

Christian Churches - The biggest pedophilia net in the world

Catholic Church Exposed as a Sick Cult of Pederasts AGAIN

https://infostormer.com/catholic-church-exposed-as-a-sick-cult-of-pederasts-again/

I honestly have no idea why anybody would want to be associated with the Catholic Church. At one point in time it might have been a legitimate religious and spiritual institution. Assuming that it was, it is no longer that, and it hasn’t been for some time. It is a sick cult of pederasts.

A Pennsylvania grand jury report has just exposed how around 1,000 children were sexually abused by over 300 priests throughout the past 70 years. It also exposes how there was a massive conspiracy to cover up what was going on.

Top Roman Catholic leaders in Pennsylvania covered up decades of child sex abuse involving more than 1,000 victims and hundreds of priests, according to a long-awaited grand jury report released Tuesday.

Capping what may be the most comprehensive examination yet of clergy sex abuse across a single state, the nearly 900-page document accuses church officials in six Pennsylvania dioceses of routinely prioritizing their institution over the welfare of children in their care.

The allegations stretch back to the 1940s, detailing child rapes and groping that mirrored the reports that have roiled the church worldwide. But the document includes several uniquely disturbing accounts of its own — including one of a 1970s pedophile and child pornography ring in Pittsburgh among priests who whipped their victims and took photos of one boy as he posed naked as if on the cross.

One priest in Southwestern Pennsylvania is said to have sexually abused a boy in a confessional. Another, from Allentown, allegedly forced a boy to give him oral sex and then cleansed the child’s mouth with holy water. Two priests impregnated teens; one urged an abortion, the other arranged a secret marriage.

And to think that there are people shocked over this. The Catholic Church is a so-called religious organization consisting of men who willfully choose not to marry. They have access to children because they are trusted by people to be men of God. It is only logical that this organization would attract homosexuals and pederasts.

This problem could potentially be fixed if they allowed priests to marry but this weird pedo shit has really done a number of the Catholic Church as a brand.

The fate of the Catholic Church ultimately doesn’t matter. We don’t need an organization like this to help us obtain a higher spiritual understanding of the world. This can be done without these sick faggots dressed up in weird costumes pretending to be men of God. They are anything but that as evidenced by their horrible deeds.

Catholic Sects promotes physical, psychological and sexual abuse of his intern and break the rules in benefit of the high clerical

Recently the fashionism is to assume a christian position and promote an unequality of christian over other religous ethnicity, blaming other of non-creator's followers, sinners, unjust, promoting a new holy war.

People around the world use this excuse for proclaiming a racial justification, concluding that new racist groups are using their faith to justify racist attacks and murdering. This global chaotic phallacy is being given and justified by leaders, political leaders, that use their faith to raise this cruzader's thinking.

The racial question here is going beyond the social question. Political leaders are getting closer and closer to christian leaders and promoting an approximation to Israel, advocating for being jewish descendants and auto-proclaiming the Israel's son and sons of the same god, justifying their salvation.

The old right that was a non religious leadership and promoted the national feeling as an unity of many different ethnicity is now disrupted by this new right, that promotes equality for jews and christians and promote different treatment to Islamists, Pagans, Afro-religious, and Satanists, that they consider an enemy.

The phallacy of this christocracy, with government under the religious blessing and government for their religious equals make the approximation with the worst christian scum, like maisntream media priests and shepards, pastors and gospel music and blame the Rock 'n Roll as a Satanic music and, also - absurdly - communist music, attacking the Rock 'n Roll as a product of Frankfurt School.

The phallacy also goes beyond their own capability of thinking right, seeing the truth, getting what insterest to them and affirming it's the highest truth, and affirming that the reality is a communist rethoric. Like nowadays the new right keeps affirming that Evola promoted christianity, Guénon promoted a christian school for traditionalism, etc.

Another rethoric is that they use the high christian to justify their hipocrite corruption, among other races and society in general, doing those corruptive acts in the name of a christian church and in the justification that they are christians. That pusilanimous act is worst than the evil they preach, for they all the time affirms themselves as the guardians of the truth.

To justify it it's not a theoretic conspiracy or any rethoric with no sense, it's just to see the recently actions as Christchurch massacre, when a white supremacist attacked mosques affriming that the country is a christian country.

Christianity is a coward form of politician, promoting inequality, attacking the differents and promoting a government with christians, subjugating the others under their own laws, based on their own beliefs. A religion that promotes racial inequality and the phallacy of determine the directions of politics.

Christian protestants are in congress. They are in the executive power and the legislative, under the excuse of bring the legality and the legal system to an universal projection. Churches are legally above the law, free of fees and with special legal system.

In general catholic churches are devoted to the Vatican laws, above the countries laws, this give a clear hide of pedophilia cases, moral and physical abuses, with no capability for the legal system to investigate the cases.

Recently in Brazil, the Heralds of the Gospel were accused of moral, physical and sexual abuse of children and teenagers, but hardly to get the involved, as they have the hierarchical system promoted by Vatican, that hides, also, cases of pedophilia in Vatican.

The promotion of a christocracy is demanded by the new right, the Alt Right, based in phisolophical system of Evola and Guénon, promoting a tradition based in capitalism and social equality under god's law, where the christians have the control, in congress, legal and presidential sphere, to promote a christian government, democratic just for their equals.

Abortion cases, in general are condemned by christianity, but in case of rape, now is their race for the total deny of abortion cases, but in offense of rape victims, accusing them cowardly of being circumstancial cases and they must accept the fate, and also, promote a new form of acceptance of the rape, in general, the rapist paying the necessities for the 'new family.

Just in their sick heads it is considered a family, considering rape a crime and offensive attacks for the rape victims, shows how christianity is a regret for the society and legal system.

Also, mysoginy is a characteristic of christianity, that promotes the patriarchal model of family, denying women's rights and the right to chose. In the case of abortion, is traumatizing to a woman, victim of rape being accused of murderer, or blamed on provocate the assault.

Feminicide is a characteristic of christian men, in most part, that don't accept the women being attracted. Also, most part of physical assaults against women is characteristic for the traditional patriarchal families, and justified in the speeches of these new christian representative, as Trump for exemple, and in Brazil by Bolsonaro's chauvinist.

The right to chose of the women is well respected in left hand's and in pagan beliefts, the right on chose of divorce or being respected as a woman, part of a social system and protected by society.

Each individual is supposed to have their faiths, but christianity is historically a religion that imposed it as the end and condemned who do not carry their spiritual beliefs.

Acceptance of new particularities is hard to loutish alt right representatives, that promotes political and social programs to christian churches, based in exchange of economic and political favours.

The old right is still promoting democratic ways, as in Russia and Syria, that are constantly attacked by this new right, independent of Muslim or Christian, the laic secular system is failing by the new right politics, regreting centuries of politics by ideologies and rethoric speeches, disrupting Evola's speeches under the idea of perpetual power and geo-strategic influence.

The new christian upheaval in politics is dangerous to democracy, following principles that atheist, spiritualists, Muslims and lef hands or pagans, have no interest to be listened to their demands, and also, no representation in politics.

Pope Francis appoints Brazilian cardinal to watch over ‘Heralds of the Gospel’

https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2019/10/01/pope-francis-appoints-brazilian-cardinal-watch-over-heralds-gospel

Pope Francis has appointed a pontifical commissioner to take charge of the international association of the faithful known as “The Heralds of the Gospel,” as well as its female and male branches of consecrated life. In a statement released on Sept. 28, the Vatican’s Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life recalled that on June 23, 2017, the congregation, together with the Dicastery for the Laity, Family and Life, ordered an “apostolic visitation” of the association and its clerical and women’s societies of apostolic life.

The communique stated that after the two congregations had “attentively studied” the conclusions of the visitation, Pope Francis approved the appointment of the Brazilian Cardinal, Raymundo Damasceno Assis, as the pontifical commissioner for the Heralds of the Gospel and its male and female branches.

This means the cardinal will take charge of the association and will be assisted in this role by Monsignor José Aparecido Gonçalves de Almedia, an auxiliary bishop of Brasilia, and Sister Marian Ambrosio, the Superior General of the Sisters of Divine Providence.

A similar oversight was ordered for the Legionaries of Christ after a scandal involving its founder and an apostolic visitation, when the pope appointed a cardinal to oversee that religious institute with a view to its renewal.

Established in 1999 by Monsignor Joao Scognamiglio Cla Dias, the Heralds of the Gospel is an offshoot of the Brazilian Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property. T.F.P. was a traditionalist Catholic political movement founded by Plinio Correa de Oliveira, a right-wing activist whom the Brazilian priest considered a friend and mentor. After de Oliveira's death in 1995, a legal dispute arose over ownership of the group; ultimately, Msgr. Cla Dias won and founded the Heralds of the Gospel.

Recognized by the Vatican as an international association of the faithful of pontifical right in 2001, the association and its branches for consecrated men and women, known as Virgo Flos Carmeli and Regina Virginum respectively, has people in more than 70 countries. Controversy about the group arose in 2017 when a video of a meeting between Msgr. Cla Dias and 60 priests of the religious association was made public on social media.

In the video, a priest standing next to the founder read several claims made by a demon during an exorcism, claiming that "the Vatican is mine" and foretelling the death of Pope Francis, causing some in the group, including Msgr. Cla Dias, to laugh. Other videos released online revealed practices by the Heralds of the Gospel not included in the Catholic Church’s Rite of Exorcism, including the use of the names of de Oliveira; his mother, Donna Lucilla; and Msgr. Cla Dias to drive out demons and physical abuse against people allegedly possessed.

Shortly after the video's publishing, the Vatican announced the apostolic visitation and Msgr. Cla Dias said he would resign as the group’s superior general. However, in a June 2017 letter announcing his resignation, Msgr. Cla Dias said he would not “renounce my mission as father” of the group and would continue “to intercede next to God” as the “living model and guardian of this charism, entrusted to me by the Holy Spirit.”

The Vatican said on Sept. 28 that the reason for the apostolic visitation in 2017 was due to “shortcomings concerning the style of government, the life of the members of the council, the pastoral care of vocations, the formation of new vocations, administration, the management of works and fundraising.”

The decision to appoint a commissioner, the Vatican said, “should not be considered a punishment, but an initiative intended for the good of the association, and an attempt to resolve existing problems.”

According to the Vatican directory on associations of apostolic right, the Heralds “strive to be instruments of holiness in the Church by encouraging close unity between faith and life, and working to evangelize temporal realities, particularly through art and culture.”

The directory also notes that their apostolate involves parish animation, evangelizing families, providing catechetical and cultural formation to young people and disseminating religious literature and that they focus especially on organizing artistic events in churches, schools, hospitals, factories, offices and prisons. Its educational efforts focus on developing an interior life firmly rooted in the Eucharist, devotion to Our Lady and fidelity to the Successor of Peter. The formation of its members involves the study of moral theology, exegesis, history and thorough training in the arts and modern languages.

Today, the Heralds are present, especially among the young, in many countries including the United States and Canada, and the association is reportedly among the fastest-growing religious organizations in the church. According to the Vatican directory, the supreme authority of the Heralds is the General Assembly, which elects the General Council to assist the General President in governing it. In each country, they gather together in sodalities, made up of men and women, with their own government elected by the assembly, coordinated by a regional council.

The Heralds have a distinctive dress, reminiscent of the medieval knights. There are indications that some in the association find the leadership of Pope Francis particularly challenging.

The Catholic church is still making excuses for paedophilia

Peter Stanford

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/feb/17/catholic-church-still-making-excuses-paedophilia-pope

Bishops around the world are joining the pope at a forum on tackling abuse. But only radical reform can solve the crisis

When the first meeting in the Vatican of bishops from around the world to discuss clerical sexual abuse was announced, hopes were high among Catholics. Finally, it seemed, the courageous, mould-breaking Pope Francis was going to force through root-and-branch reforms to tackle the scandal that has done such damage to the reputation of the institution he leads.

Yet even before an expected 190 church leaders assemble on Thursday in Rome for this unprecedented four-day summit, the chance of such prayers being answered is looking increasingly remote.

The Vatican press office has been downplaying the event – whose participants include not only bishops but also a number of cardinals and representatives of religious orders and Vatican departments – as simply an opportunity to remind senior clerics of the patchy efforts that global Catholicism has made this past quarter of a century to address the thousands upon thousands of cases of priests molesting, abusing and traumatising children in their care.

To be fair, a reminder is no bad thing, since there is a long list of bishops around the globe who still make negative headlines because they refuse to take this crisis seriously, and put protecting the institution before the victims of predator priests.

Even in the Vatican itself, the powerful Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith has refused a very basic request from the Commission for the Protection of Minors, set up by Francis in 2014, to send a letter acknowledging receipt of every new report of abuse that reaches it.

There is so much that the summit could insist be done better, but it will require the pope to come out fighting. And on that score, the omens are not good. On his return flight from his latest overseas trip – to a World Youth Day gathering in Panama at the end of last month – Francis offered scant encouragement. “The problem of abuse will continue,” he told reporters, as if it were as inevitable as the sunrise. “It is a human problem.”

He sounds as much in denial as his predecessors. When the first shocking disclosures of clerical abuse emerged in the 1990s, Pope John Paul II referred to those clerics who abused children as a “few bad apples”. His successor, Benedict XVI, pointed an accusing finger instead at the high number of closeted gay men in the clergy. Though it flies in the face of all secular, scientific and psychosexual orthodoxy, the leaders of Catholicism (as many as 80% of them gay themselves, according to a new book by sociologist Frederic Martel) persist in equating same-sex adult sexual attraction with the violent rape of children by grown men.

Francis resorted to an even more outdated explanation in September last year. In language that owed much to medieval theology, he blamed it all on the devil, a malign force tempting otherwise good priests to sexually abuse children.

So is there really any possibility that this gathering in Rome might just be a road-to-Damascus moment for Catholicism in a crisis that has shaken it to its core? Naively, perhaps, I continue to hope so. Back in June 2011 I wrote in these pages of the profound blow to my own faith of learning that our beloved priest and family friend, Father Kit Cunningham – who had married us and baptised our children, one of whom was named after him – was not the eccentric but essentially good man of God that I had always believed him to be, but a child abuser whose past crimes had been known to his religious superiors, who didn’t breathe a word of it.

The logical thing would have been to walk out then, but I clung to the notion that the failings of individuals didn’t make redundant the Catholicism that is so much a part of me. And so I have persisted, but it has not helped when church leaders trot out the same discredited excuses in place of mature reflection on how things need to change.

Perhaps the most misleading excuse given is that Catholicism is just the same as others, including the BBC, that have faced charges over harbouring those who abuse children. However, a range of studies suggests that Catholicism is different. The number of paedophiles found in the male population at large is usually put at anywhere up to 4%. Yet the recent Australian Royal Commission on child sex abuse by Catholic priests suggests the figure in clerical ranks is as high as 7%. That’s almost double, and should be ringing alarm bells.

Even the Vatican’s own newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano, has suggested that the absence of women in leadership roles plays a part. Statistically, women are far less likely to sexually abuse children. Yet Catholicism clings to the almost laughable explanation that, because there were only men at the Last Supper, only men can be priests.

The product of this stubbornness is a secretive, male culture at the top of Catholicism where large numbers of priests routinely break their vows of celibacy. It is an appalling moral failure and needs to end now, but that will involve rethinking an entire approach to sexuality in Catholicism that is peculiar, punitive and often plain perverse. The Jesus of the gospels had almost no interest in such matters. Why does the Church leadership? It is a question that would take more than four days to answer, were it even to make it on to the agenda in Rome this week.

Instead, expect more make-do-and-mend, fine words, dramatic gestures, and then crossing of fingers and hoping it will all go away.

It won’t. And faithful but despairing Catholics will continue quietly to depart the pews.

The Catholic Church’s grim history of ignoring priestly pedophilia – and silencing would-be whistleblowers

http://theconversation.com/the-catholic-churchs-grim-history-of-ignoring-priestly-pedophilia-and-silencing-would-be-whistleblowers-102387

Widespread public shock followed the recent release of the Pennsylvania grand jury report that identified more than 1,000 child victims of clergy sexual abuse. In fact, as I know through my research, the Vatican and its American bishops have known about the problem of priestly pedophilia since at least the 1950s. And the Church has consistently silenced would-be whistleblowers from within its own ranks.

In the memory of many Americans, the only comparable scandal was in Massachusetts, where, in 2002, the Boston Globe published more than 600 articles about abuses under the administration of Cardinal Bernard Law. That investigation was immortalized in the 2015 award-winning film, “Spotlight.”

What many Americans don’t remember, however, are other similar scandals, some even more dramatic and national in scope.

Doubling down on secrecy

While the problem of priestly pedophilia might be centuries old, the modern paper trail began only after World War II, when “treatment centers” appeared for rehabilitating abusive priests. Instead of increased transparency, bishops, at the same time, developed methods for denying and hiding allegations of child sexual abuse.

During the 1950s and 1960s, bishops from around the U.S. began referring abusive priests to church-run medical centers, so that they could receive evaluation and care without disclosing their crimes to independent clinicians.

Fr. Gerald Fitzgerald, who began his ministry in Boston and Quebec, was among those who advocated prayer over medicine. In 1947, Fitzgerald moved to New Mexico and founded the Servants of the Paraclete, a new order of Catholic priests devoted to healing deviant clergy. His belief in faith healing reflected a vocal minority of Catholic leaders who still viewed psychology as a threat to Christian faith.

Fitzgerald based the Paracletes in New Mexico. From 1947 to 1995, the state became a dumping ground for pedophile priests. As Kathleen Holscher, chair of Roman Catholic studies at the University of New Mexico, has observed, this practice forced New Mexico’s parishes to absorb, in effect, abusive priests from across the country.

Other priests sent to the Paracletes were returned back into ministry in their home diocese, reassigned to new parishes that had no way of knowing about their abusive past.

This system was sustained, in part, by the fact that few diocesan personnel files recorded past accusations by children and parents. As Richard Sipe, a psychologist who worked at a similar Catholic treatment center later revealed, bishops generally masked past accusations by instead recording code words like “tickling,” “wrestling” or “entangled friendship” in personnel files.

By 1956, Fitzgerald became convinced that pedophilia could not be treated, even as he continued to believe that prayers could cure other illnesses, such as alcoholism. He petitioned U.S. bishops to stop sending him their child abusers, advocating instead for firing abusive priests and permanently removing them from ministry.

Fitzgerald eventually appealed directly to the Vatican, and met with Pope Paul VI to discuss the problem in 1963.

Hush money

It is unclear when the Church began using hush settlements to silence victims. The practice, however, was so widespread by the 1980s that the Vatican assigned church lawyers to adjust their insurance policies in order to minimize additional liabilities.

These included Fr. Thomas Doyle, a nonparish priest who specialized in Roman Catholicism’s internal laws; Fr. Michael Petersen, a trained psychiatrist who believed that priests with abusive disorders should be treated medically; and Roy Mouton, a civil attorney who represented one of the church’s most notorious pedophile priests.

Together, they authored a 92-page report and submitted it for presentation at the 1985 meeting of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops, the Church’s apparatus for controlling and governing American priests.

The document estimated that American bishops should plan to be sued for at least US$1 billion, and up to $10 billion, over the following decades.

Several of the nation’s most powerful cardinals buried the report.

In response, Doyle mailed all 92 pages, along with an executive summary, to every diocese in the United States. Yet there is no evidence that any bishops headed the report’s warnings.

1992: The nation’s first scandal

During the 1980s, victims began to speak out against the church’s systemic attempts to mask the scope of the crisis. In 1984, survivors of Fr. Gilbert Gauthe refused to be silenced by hush money, instead choosing the painful path of initiating public lawsuits in Louisiana. Gauthe ultimately confessed to abusing 37 children.

As these stories became public, more and more victims began to bring lawsuits against the Church. In Chicago, the nation’s first two clergy abuse survivor organizations, Victims of Clergy Sexual Abuse Linkup (LINKUP) and the Survivors’ Network for Those Abused by Priests (SNAP), were created in 1987.

In 1992, survivor Frank Fitzpatrick’s public allegations led to revelations that Fr. James Porter had abused more than 100 other children in Massachusetts. Widespread shock followed at the time as well as after Fitzpatrick’s appearance on ABC’s “Primetime Live,” when news anchor Diane Sawyer interviewed Fitzpatrick and 30 other Porter victims.

The national outcry forced dioceses across the country to create public standards for how they were handling abuse accusations, and American bishops launched new marketing campaigns to regain trust.

In spite of internal pledges to reform their culture of covering up abuses, the Pennsylvania grand jury report demonstrates that the Church’s de facto policy remains unchanged since the 1950s: Instead of reporting rape and sexual abuse to secular authorities, bishops instead continue to transfer predatory priests from one unsuspecting parish to the next.

Victims with no hope of justice

The issue of clergy sex abuse has also unleashed broader questions about justice and faith: Can courtrooms repair souls? How do survivors continue to pray and attend Mass?

As a scholar who studies communities of clergy abuse victims, I have asked Catholics to share their thoughts about the current crisis. Many of them tell me that “at least” Boston’s Cardinal Law “went to jail.” That leads to an awkward moment when I have to refresh their memory.

Cardinal Law was neither indicted nor arrested. Instead, Pope John Paul II transferred Law to run one of the Vatican’s most cherished properties, the Basilica of Saint Mary, essentially rewarding Law for his deft cover-up of the abuses in Boston.

In fact, no American bishops or cardinals have ever been jailed for their role in covering up and enabling child sexual abuse. Civil settlements have held the Church accountable only financially. A combination of political complacency and expired statutes of limitations has prevented most survivors from obtaining real justice.

Outraged by this lack of justice, survivors urged the International Criminal Court at The Hague to investigate the Vatican for crimes against humanity. The International Criminal Court declined, citing the fact that many of the alleged crimes occurred before the court was formed, and were thus beyond the scope of the court’s “temporal jurisdiction.”

To date, the highest-ranking priest tried in an American court is Philadelphia’s Monsignor William Lynn, who was charged with conspiracy and two counts of endangering children. His 2012 conviction for one count of endangerment was vacated by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in 2016. He now awaits an unscheduled retrial.

Even as scholars and theologians have called for all of the American bishops to resign, there has been little talk of criminal prosecutions. If yesterday’s survivors do not find justice, tomorrow’s children will not know safety.

As the Pennsylvania grand jury emphasized:

“There have been other reports about child sexual abuse within the Catholic church… For many of us, those earlier stories happened someplace else, someplace away. Now we know the truth: it happened everywhere.”