Media manipulation and propaganda to disrupt mind of children (government strategos to social destablization)

Organizations with a wide range of political and criminal agendas have historically relied on coercive interrogation and brainwashing of various types to force submission and information from enemies and victims, and to indoctrinate and increase cooperation in members and captors. In modern times, these techniques are used by political/military/espionage organizations, race/ethnic hate-groups, criminal groups (e.g., child pornographers and sex rings, and international traffickers of women, children, guns, and drugs) and exploitative and destructive cults with spiritual or other agendas. Methods of “thought reform” used by such groups include intimidation, social isolation, religious indoctrination, threats against victims or their loved ones, torture, torture of co-captives, and brainwashing through social influence or deprivation of basic needs, such as sleep or food (Hassan, 2000).

(Lacter, Forensic Aspects of Dissociative Identity Disorder, p. 186).

Another form of mind control is spiritual in nature, resultind in the perception of evil and threatening attachments, claims, curses, and covenants. In abusive rituals, witchcraft (not Wicca) abusers seek to attach evil entities (spirits of abusers and demons) to dissociated identitities to harass and control victims for their entire lives. Abusive claims are used to forever malevolently define victims as evil, physically or mentalli ill, socially devalued and isolated, sexually enslaved, a murderer, a cult member, a witch, and so forth. Curses, hexes, vezes, and spells are used to attempt to inflict physical and psychological harm. Witchcraft covenants are perceived agreements, generally made in reaction to terrorization or double-binds, to cause the victim to believe he or she freely commited to the abuser's agenda.

(Lacter, Forensic Aspects of Dissociative Identity Disorder, p. 187).

Still more sophisticated abusers give commands to dissociate ego-states. Abusers administer torture, ofter combined with drugs, to obstruct the individual's conscious processing and to accress dissociated ego-states (identities, personalities) formed in earlier abuse. The designated personalities are commanded to commit acts or to think and fear particular things that further the abuser's agenda. Commin mandates include, "Remember to fortet" the abuse, and "Dont' tell" about the abuse.In child victims who do not yet have any dossiciated identities, torture may be applied to force the formation of a new ego-state who can thereafter be manipulated to serve the abuser's agenda. In indiduals with already-formed dissociated ego-states, as in dissociative identity disorder, a particular methid of torture may be used to access a particular ego-state of whom the abuser has prior knowledge. Alternatively, a new form of torture may be applied to force the psyche to create a new ego-state, whom the abusers will then use for a new purpose. A central function of this technique is to cause the victim to re-experience, both physically and psychologically, the pain and terror of the tortured ego-states should the individual consider violating abusers commands. The experience of the original torture often leaks to the host personality in rushes of terror and somatic manifestations of the abuse, such as pain, bruising, or swelling (though not degree of the original injury), with no conscious registration of the abuse or abused ego-state.

(Lacter, Forensic Aspects of Dissociative Identity Disorder, p. 188).

Installation of mind-control programming relies on the victim's capacity to form new dissociated ego-states (personalities) to hold and hide programming behind walled-off amnesic barriers. Already dissociative children are prima candidates for programming. Alternatively, very young children can be made to be dissociative through torture. The estreme abuse of inflicted on young children if familial satanic and witchcraft cults intentionally and reliably induces the formation of dissociated ego-states in the psyche. Many ritual abuse survivors report that other abuser groups with criminal, political, military, and espionage agendas infiltrate their familial cults to gain access to their own agendas, often paying ult parents large sums of money to be able to program these children.

(Lacter, Forensic Aspects of Dissociative Identity Disorder, p. 189).

In high sophisticated mind control, the indivitual is programmed to perceive structures in the unconscious inner landscate. "Structures" are mental representations of objects - for exemple, buildings, grids, devices of torture, and other containers - that hold programmed comands, messages, information and personalities. In many cases, walls are also installed that serve as barriers to hide deeper levels of programming and structures. Unconscious personalities perceive themselves as trapped within, or attached to, these structures, both visually (in internal imagery) and somatically (in experiences of pain, suffocation, electroshock, etc).

Structures are installed in early childhood, generally between 2 and 5 years of age. Torture and drugs are applied beyond the endurance of all of the already formed personalities, which usually requires that the child be taken near death. The intent is to bury all memory for the event deeply in the unconscious mind, below the level of conscious perception of all personalities. When all conscious processing of information is blocked, the child cannot mentally process or mentally resist any of the programmer's input, cannot reject it as "not me" or as untrue. Instead, the input is "taken in whole", into the uncoscious mind, with no conscious memory, and therefore no ability to recall, process, or reject it later.

The child may be tortured on or in a device, and the personalities formed in this process then perceive themselves trapped on or in this device. Alternatively, an image of an object may be protected on the child's body or on screen or in virtual-reallity goggles, or a physical model of the object may be shown. The programmer then tells the child that this device or object is now within or him or her. Because the mind of the small child does not easily discriminate reality from fantasy (this process relies, in part, on pre-school child's stage of magical thinking), and the child now perceives the object as a structire within.

(Lacter, Forensic Aspects of Dissociative Identity Disorder, p. 190).

Immediately after the structure is installed, the programmer will generally command traumatized persinalities to go to places in structures - for example, "Go inside teh grid". The programmer will generally also install the perception of wires, bombs and reset buttons, to prevent removal of the structure. The child is usually shown something to make him or her perceive these as real - for example, wores places on boty parts and a button on the belly-button.

(Lacter, Forensic Aspects of Dissociative Identity Disorder, p. 191).

The person may dread his or her own birthday, Christmas, Easter, or other days, without conscious memory of a frightening event on that date. There mey be increased depression, anxiety, self-harm, and so forth. The individual may have large gaps in memory, often for an entire year of mre of their childhood, with greater recall for times before and immediately after that period of time. There may be no memory for particular past places of residence. The person may display unusual behaviour in relation to the telephone - for example, stront fear or a startle response to the phone ringing, many hang-up calls coming to the home, a compulsion to make calls (ofter toll-free), or ginding the phone is his or her hands in early morning hours without any memory of having made a phone call. There may be a pattern of increased "dead-air" phone calls in which no one answers they pick up the phone and say "Hello", particularly on cult call-back dates, such as birthdays or ritual holidays.

(Lacter, Forensic Aspects of Dissociative Identity Disorder, p. 193).

Schooling plays a big role in programming the population, but the most potent and prevalent educational tools are the mass media. These are devised to reach a large audience via the broadcasting of information through natural means (spoken or written language, posters) or technological ones (radio, television, cinema, the Internet). With time, the elite has come to control all the important mass media outlets and are now able to dictate their contents.

Around 1920, theTavistock Institute became the center for the study of human behavior, mind control, propaganda, and social manipulation. Created in London, it spread overseas with the financial help of the Rockefeller Foundation. Its influence increased when it combined the study of anthropology, economy, organizations, politics, psychology, psychoanalysis, psychiatry, and sociology. For example, Tavistock organized social phenomena such as the hippie counterculture and the use of mind-altering drugs. Its primary objectives were and still remain the organization of cultural changes through the imposition of chaos and the occult manipulation of special groups. With a 2012 budget of around 6 billion USD, it is now made up of 10 institutions, 400 subsidiary companies, and 3,000 study groups. In secret, Tavistock guides powerful multinationals such as the Rand Corp. (media, politics, commerce, health, education, defense), the Mitre Corp. (defense, revenue, national security), the Stanford and Hudson Institutes.

After 90 years of research, Tavistock’s main discovery concerns child sexuality. This has a great influence on the development of personality. Early sex stimulation produces adults whose emotional development is similar to that of a neurotic child. Their second discovery is related to stress. Tavistock researchers found out that people under controlled stress became more infantile and gave up strongly held beliefs under group pressure to conform to popular opinion. That explains why the mass media insist so much on sex, violence, and fear-inducing messages. We are being turned into scared, submissive children who try to evade the stress of daily life through emotional masturbation – television, radio, CDs, DVDs, movies, and video games.

Tavistock hastened to study the effects of television on human behavior as early as the 1940’s. Its researchers discovered that 30 seconds after one starts watching TV, the brain automatically begins to produce alpha waves, a modified state of consciousness. The viewer goes into a trance-like mode, a type of light hypnosis. All their attention becomes concentrated on the screen, while the rest of their environment is ignored. In this semi-conscious state, they become highly susceptible to the messages contained in the programs, especially the commercials, which are created especially for that purpose.

Television started becoming popular in the fifties, and the elite have now accumulated more than 60 years of experience spread over three generations of viewers. The results are staggering. People are no longer logical, as their opinions and ideas come directly from television. The images validate what they hear. This filter of tele-opinions gets automatically superimposed over their daily reality, and have become passive members of a plugged-in society, and can no longer think, talk, or write logically. For them, images and knowledge are synonymous.

(http://www.wakingtimes.com/2014/02/26/brain-washing-social-control-programming-kill-your-television/).

The CIA mind-control apparatus has been well known since 1975, when 10 large boxes of documents were released pursuant to Freedom of Information Act requests.

Several good books were then written on the subject of the CIA program known as MK-ULTRA. Officially spanning ten years from 19 52-62, MK-ULTRA involved the use of LSD on unwitting military and civilian subjects in the United States. LSD and more powerful compounds were given under duress as brainwashing and truth serum drugs. The program’s aim was to find drugs which would irresistibly bring out deep confessions or wipe a subject’ s mind clean and program him or her as “a robot agent.”

In experimental test situations, people were given acid without their knowledge, then interrogated under bright lights with doctors sitting in the background taking notes. Threats would be made. The test subjects were told that their LSD “downer trips” would be extended indefinitely if they refused to reveal their closely-guarded military secrets. The people being interrogated in this way were CIA employees, U.S. military personnel and, abroad, agents suspected of working for the other side in the Cold War. Long-term severe debilitation and several documented deaths resulted. Much, much more could be said about MK-ULTRA.

None of this prepared people for the explosive testimony made on March 15, 1995, in Washington, D.C., before the President’s Committee on Radiation, however. In unpublicized sessions, New Orleans therapist Valerie Wolf introduced two of her patients who had uncovered memories of being part of extensive CIA brainwashing programs as young children (in one case, starting at age seven). Their brainwashing included torture, rape, electroshock, powerful drugs, hypnosis and death threats. According to their testimony, the CIA then induced amnesia to prevent their recalling these terrifying sessions.

Children were trained as sex agents, for example, with the job of blackmailing prominent Americans — primarily politicians, businessmen and educators. A great deal of filming was done for this purpose. Eventually, people from the inner core of the CIA program filmed each other, and some of the centers where children were used as sex agents got out of control and turned into CIA-operated sex rings.

Some children were considered expendable and simply murdered.

(https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2017/03/20/us-mk-ultra-mind-control-cia-experiments-with-mind-control-on-children-by-jon-rappoport/).

On one end of the spectrum of mind control conspiracy theories are tales of sinister forces targeting individuals and turning them into mind controlled slaves. At the other extreme, opposite of this bespoke, personal mental manipulation are arguments that our entire culture is being manipulated through mind control on a massive scale. While the mass media, pharmaceutical industry, or other entities are common culprits the motives behind their manipulation vary widely. Some are remarkably prosaic: a desire for increased profits or domination of a particular market leads a corporation to use techniques such as subliminal advertising, to covertly influence buyers' decisions. Oters mind control culprits are more exotic, using technologies such as extremely low frequency (or ELF) waves to manipulate entire populations to accept or reject reject those policies or politicians that shadowy manipulators found desirable or undesirable.

(Gulyas, Aaron John, Conspiracy Theories: The Roots, Themes and Propagation of Paranoid Political and Cultural Narratives).

In modern times this same method has been applied to promote feminist movement in the 1970s through the creatin of Ms. Magazine and the push to demonize stay-at-home moms. Kim Kardashian and other skilless skanks are promoted as role models even though they have no real value, and are worthless and talentless false idols adversites by the mainstream who cry about sexism and the "culturally programed gender roles" only want to give up the roles society expects of them, while still demanding men to continue following theirs.

Women who winte about "equal rights" still expect men to always pay for dates and buy them expensive gifts. Women who don't fell it's their duty to know how to cook still feel men should fix things around the house and diagnose their car problems. And of course, feminist women who proclaim they want to end the gender roles still expect their man to cough up thousand dollars on a diamond engagement ring whey the courtship is on the road to marriage. Feminism is one-way hypocritical double standard street that not only targets men, but also other women who resist giving in to this cultural Marxism.

(Dice, Mark. Inside the Illuminati: Evidence, Objectives, and Methods of Operation; Using Feminism to Break Down Families)

Tyrants throughout history have known that if they are to effectively maintain their power they myst indocrinate they youth with their brand of propaganda to ensure the children come of age, they will blindly support the leader and his ideologies. Adolf Hitler used the Nazi Youth program to braiwash children begining at young age, he Taliban in Afghanistan banned girls from going to scholl at all to keep them ignorant; and North Korea's strict control of their education system are just a few examples of this in our modern era.

The indocrination of students by the public school sistem is clear today with programs like Common Core and the promotion of the Big Government nanny state and the gay lifestyle while demonizing the second Amendment right to bear arms and belief in God. (...)

While the vast majority of students attend public schools are primarly concerned with the latest teen idol, their favorite professional sports teams, or simply getting drunk and high, children of the elite are taught team building, networking skills, and other tools to prepare them to rapidly advance up the social hierarchy once they enter the "real world".

The Rickefeller family has been one of the most powerful Illuminati families for generations and the "Aristotelean method of antiquity" that Edward Harkness paid to implement at Philips Exeter Academy was based on the ideology of the Greek philosopher Aristotle (a student of Plato) who believed that most people were too stupid to govern themselves, and that society should be structured in the way that "philosopher kings" should rule and decide what was best for the people.

(Dice, Mark. Inside the Illuminati: Evidence, Objectives, and Methods of Operation; Using Schools to Indocrinate the Youth)

It's absurd to allow a person with a penis whose birth certificate shows they're a male - and who has all the other physical components of a male - to allow them to use the women's bathroom or locker room. It also puts women in danger of being victims of Peeping Toms and rapist because now any men can enter the women's bathroom just by claimming he feels like his gender is female.

Transgenderism is being promoted as a cool new trend in Hollywood, and "trans" prople are being hailed as having achieved the nest step of human evolution and freedom.

The idea of mergint the gender is now being promoted with young children. More and more companies are releasing what they're calling "gender neutral" clothing for kids that consist of pink t-shirts with motorcycles and dump trucks printed on them, and dresses embroidered with pictures of dinossaurs. The liberal "news" outlet the Huffington Post called the clothing likes "brillant" since they "work to combat the gender norms that seem to pervasive in kids' wardobe options.

(Dice, Mark. The Illuminati in Hollywood: Celebrities, Conspiracies, and Secret Societies; The Transgender Agenda).

Today, much of the American mainstream media and other outlets in countries around the world are under the control of the government. In some countries the State-controlled television is clerly evident, but in places like America sich control is done more covertly, leading many to believe that it is a "free and independent" press. In 1975 a congressional investigation discovered the CIA had virtually every editor the major news outlets in their pocket.

For decades both the Pentagon and the CIA have had entire divisions dedicated to working with Hollywood in order to literally help produce major television shows and movies. When studios want access expensive military equipment like aircrafts and tanks or actual Army bases, they approach these government television and film liaisons and if the storylike is seen as protraying a current war or particular military branch of government agency in a favourable light, then then projects are approved and producers are given access to consultants, equipment, uniforms, military bases, and even given active duty servicemen and women to work as extras.

(Dice, Mark. Inside the Illuminati: Evidence, Objectives, and Methods of Operation; Controlling the Media)

Psyops and mind control, infiltration and Psywar

There are two basic types of needs identified by social scientists—biological (or physiological) and social. Biological needs are those elements necessary to sustain life: food, water, air, shelter, and procreation. These needs are common to all cultures, though different cultures will seek to satisfy these needs in different manners. Social needs are those learned from society through the enculturation process (the process by which an individual learns the traditional content of a culture and assimilates its practices and values). Every culture will have different social needs and different priorities for satisfying those needs. (FM3-05-301 - Psychological Operations Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures, 5-25).

Organizations with a wide range of political and criminal agendas have historically relied on coercive interrogation and brainwashing of various types to force submission and information from enemies and victims, and to indoctrinate and increase cooperation in members and captors. In modern times, these techniques are used by political/military/espionage organizations, race/ethnic hate-groups, criminal groups (e.g., child pornographers and sex rings, and international traffickers of women, children, guns, and drugs) and exploitative and destructive cults with spiritual or other agendas. Methods of “thought reform” used by such groups include intimidation, social isolation, religious indoctrination, threats against victims or their loved ones, torture, torture of co-captives, and brainwashing through social influence or deprivation of basic needs, such as sleep or food (Hassan, 2000). (Lacter, Forensic Aspects of Dissociative Identity Disorder, p. 186).

At the most basic level, terrified submission is used to control behavior. The invididual outwardly complies with the abuser(s), but individual's own beliefs and identity are consciusly preserved.

In other cases, an individual may be induced to comply willingly. For example, a troubled or abused person is provided with objects, drugs, affection, sex, "freedom", and so forth and consciously chooses compliance with the abuser over his/her current life situation.

In cases of religious indocrination, a psychologically weak or dependent persons submits to a charismatic leader who professes to be chosen for a spiritual agenda by a powerful deity, and who promises salvation to devotees and evernal damnation to non-followers.

Cases of "Stockholm Syndrome" involve deeper psychological controls. Terrorization (harm or threats of harm to the victim and/or victim's loved ones), plus isolation from prior support, ofter combined with lies of abandonment by loved ones, leads to dependence on the abuser(s) and perveived loyalty to the abuser(s).

The term "brainwashing" is typically used to describe the use of a combination of social influence, regimentation of routine, and deprivation of basic needs, to attain still-fulle control of the individual's mind. A person is placed only among successful "converts" to the abuser or group, who profess the belief system of the group, while the person is isolated from the loved ones and previous support systems and activities. Basic needs, including sleep, food, and water, are withdrawn, and activities are regimented to modify beliefs, inclusing chanting, praying, indocrination and social isolation.

At a more sophisticated leve, modification of self-view as evil or as an accomplice to a crime is used. Abusers may force an individual into double-binds to cause the individual to feel morally culpable. The individual is told to make a choice to commit a morally reprehensible act, such as hurting a person or animal, with an implied or direct threat that unbearable harm will come to self or others for failure to "choose" this act.

(...)

A further method of mind control is "psychic driving", in which taped messages are played non-stop for hours while the person is in states of consciousness altered by electroshock, drugs, isolation, confinement, deprivation of sleep, food, water, sleep oxygen, and sensory inpyt, or other torture. This methodology was utilized by Dr. Ewen Cameron in the 1950s. In 1997, the CIA was sued by a number of Cameron's ex-patients. The Canadian court found in favour of the patients who endured Cameron's tortures in teh name of creating a more efficiant Manchurian Candidate for the CIA. Ross (2000) and Rutz (2001) also describe the US CIA projects - MK ULTRA and others - which used unwitting human subjects for mind-control experimenttion and exploitation. Lacter, Forensic Aspects of Dissociative Identity Disorder, p. 187).

Psychological Operations are planned to convey selected information and indicators to audiences to influence emotions, motives, objective reasoning and ultimately the behavior of organizations, groups and individuals (Rouse, 2012). Psychological operations have involved a variety of tactics and technologies to influence target audiences (FM 33-1-1, 2003)

A psychological warfare campaign is a war of the mind. PSYOP can be disseminated by face-to-face communication, audio visual means (television), audio media (radio or loudspeaker), visual media or the digital domain. The weapon is not the delivery system, but the message it carries and how that message affects a target audience (Rouse, 2012).

There are three types of psychological operations: tactical, strategic and consolidation activities. Tactical PSYOP is targeted towards specific enemy combat groups to induce them to perform a specific action that will affect the current or short-range combat situation. Aimed at a larger audience, strategic PSYOP involves a carefully planned campaign against a larger target audience. The mission of consolidation PSYOP is to assist the civil and military authorities in consolidating their gains, by establishing and maintaining law and order and by re-establishing civil government in an occupied or liberated area (USDA, 1994). All three types of psychological operations have been employed by both governments and terrorist groups.

Regardless of the type of psychological operations used by governments or terrorist groups, propaganda is a major component of any psychological operations campaign. It is employed to influence various target groups. Modern propaganda is classified as white, gray, or black according to the degree to which the sponsor conceals or acknowledges its involvement (Gray and Martin, 2007). White propaganda is correctly attributed to the sponsor and the source

is truthfully identified. Gray propaganda is unattributed to the sponsor and conceals the real source of the propaganda. The objective of gray propaganda is to promote viewpoints that are in the interest of the originator but that would be more acceptable to target audiences than official statements. Black propaganda, on the other hand, camouflages the sponsor's participation.

While gray propaganda is unattributed, black propaganda is falsely attributed.  Black propaganda is subversive and provocative; it is designed to appear to have originated from a hostile source in order to cause that source embarrassment, to damage its prestige, to undermine its credibility, or

to get it to take actions that it might not otherwise pursue (DA-Pam 550-104, 1966). (BATES and MOONEY, 2014, Psychological Operations and Terrorism: The Digital Domain, p.1).

(...)

While terrorism is generally associated with young men (Awan, Hoskins, & O’Loughlin, 2011), the digital domain has also provided a venue for the recruitment of female participants who are generally less attracted by messages of violence. For example, in 44 Ways to Support Jihad, respected leader Anwar Al Awalki, who has been credited with the online radicalization of the Fort Hood shooter and the Christmas Bomber, implores non-violent supporters to disseminate jihadist literature and news through its “WWW Jihad” initiative (Al-Awalaki, 2010).

He further encourages “nasheers,” Islamic musicians and poets, to expand their audiences beyond Islam by performing in different languages and forums.

Most terrorists possess a controlled hate that is “disciplined, purposeful and intrinsically rewarding” and that is buoyed by their peers (Ryan, Vanderlick, & Matthews, 2006).

Individualized interactions involving self-radicalized terrorists stem from the omnipresent deconstructed framework of modern terrorist organizations. This type of “leaderless resistance” has spawned a new generation of lone wolf -terrorists who will die for their cause based upon ideological justifications (propaganda) and directions being dispensed from a distance (Bates, 2012). Lone wolves were also responsible for the first major acts of domestic terrorism: a midair plane bombing, product contamination and anthrax attacks (Thomson, 2013). (BATES and MOONEY, 2014, Psychological Operations and Terrorism: The Digital Domain, p.5).

Media analysis is the structured, deliberate tracking and analysis of opponent and neutral media (TV, radio, Internet, and print). Properly performed media analysis, although time-consuming and linguist-intensive, can identify trends and become predictive when the supported force considers a potentially unpopular activity. To be truly effective, media analysis must be conducted on a daily basis. PSYOP units usually do not have the organic personnel sufficient to accomplish this task. (FM3-05-301 - Psychological Operations Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures, 11-17).

Processing opponent information and propaganda refers to the movement of the information through non-PSYOP and PSYOP channels. PSYOP personnel must ensure that their supported unit HQ and all of its subordinate units understand where suspected opponent propaganda and information is sent. All collection agencies must know that PSYOP units have the mission of analyzing opponent propaganda and information. (FM3-05-301 - Psychological Operations Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures, 11-19).

Trauma-based mind-control programming further exploits dissociated ego states to more efficiently control the individual on a deeply unconscious level. Systematic torture is used to block the victims capacity for conscious processing (through pain, terror, drugs, illuson, hypnosis, sensory, deprivation, sensory overstimulation, oxygen deprivation, cold, heat, spinning, brain stimualation, etc., and often, near-death), followed by the use of suggestion and/or classical and operant conditioning (consistent with well-established behaviour-modification principles) to implant thoughts, directives, and perceptions in the unconscious mind, ofter in newly formed trauma-induced dissociated identities, that force the victim to do, feel, think, or perceive things for the purposes of the programmer. The objective is for the victim to follow directives with no conscious awareness, including execution of acts in clear violation of the victim's moral principles, spiritual convictions, and volition.

Instalation of mind-control programming relies on the victim's capacity to form new dissociated ego-states (personalities) to hold and hide programming behind walled-off amnesic barriers. Already dissociative children are prime candidates for programming. Alternatively, very young children can be made to be dissociative though torture.

(...)

Many ritual abuse survivors reports that other abuser groups with ciminal, political, military and espionage agendas infiltrate their familial cults to gain access to these readily programmable children to use them to serve their own agendas, often paying cult parents large sums of money to be able to program these children.

One more function of trauma-based mind-control programming is to cause the victim to physically and psychologically re-experience the torture used to install the programming should the victim consider violating its directives. The most common programs are unidimensional directives communicated during torture and impaired states of consciousness to "Remember to fortet" the abuse and "Don't tell" about the abuse.

Much trauma-based mind-control programming is significantly more complex, more technological in its methods of installation, and utilizes the individual's dissociated ego-states (persinalities) to effect greater layering of psychological effects. Persinalities are usually programmed to take executive control of the mind and body in response to particular cues (hand signals, tones, spojen names, etc.), and then follow directives, with complete amnesia for these events. (Lacter, Forensic Aspects of Dissociative Identity Disorder, p. 188)

Levels of Brainwashing and Mind Control from Least to Most Complex and Binding, and often used in combination, especially in ritual abuse:

1. Terrified Submission: Outward compliance, but one’s own beliefs and identity are preserved.

2. Willful Compliance: A disturbed or abused child/adolescent/adult is provided with objects, drugs, affection, sex, “freedom”, etc., and chooses the abuser over his/her current life situation.

3. Stockholm Syndrome: Terror (abuser harms victim or threatens victim and his/her family with violence), plus isolation from prior support, often combined with lies of family abandonment, lead to dependence on abuser(s), and perceived loyalty to the abuser.

4. Religious Indoctrination: A psychologically weak or dependent person submits to a charismatic leader who claims to be spiritually connected to some kind of God, professing to be chosen for a spiritual agenda, promises salvation to devotees and eternal damnation promised to non-followers.

5. Brainwashing through Social influence: An individual is placed only among successful “converts” to the abuser or cult, who profess the belief system of the group, while the person is isolated from family and previous support systems and activities.

6. Brainwashing through Deprivation of Basic Needs: Sleep, food, water, combined with chanting, social isolation, etc.

7. Self-View as an Accomplice or Evil: Abuser forces victim into double-binds that cause the victim to feel culpable.

8. Unidimensional directives: are communicated during severe abuse, convincing affected personalities that the abuse will re-occur if the programmed mandate is broken. The most common are, “Remember to forget” the abuse and “Don’t tell” about the abuse. A central function of most mind control is to cause the victim to physically and psychologically re-experience the torture used to install the programming should she or he act in violation of programmed commands. The re-experience of the original torture often includes somatic manifestation of the original injuries, such as bruising and swelling, though not to the degree of the original injury.

9. Spiritual “Programming”: Evil attachments, claims, curses, covenants, etc. Witchcraft ritual abuse seeks to “attach” evil entities (spirits of abusers and demons) to dissociated identities to harass and control victims for their entire lives. Claims, curses, covenants, hexes, vexes, etc. are used to forever malevolently define victims as evil, physically or mentally ill, socially devalued and isolated, sexually enslaved, a murderer, a cult member, a witch, etc.

10. Psychic driving: Taped messages are played for hours non-stop while the person is in states of consciousness altered by sleep, electro-shock, sensory deprivation, inadequate food, water, sleep, oxygen, isolated, confinement or other torture.

12. Trauma-based Coercive Mind Control– Trauma-based mind control programming can be defined as systematic torture that blocks the victim’s capacity for conscious processing (through pain, terror, drugs, illusion, sensory deprivation, sensory over-stimulation, oxygen deprivation, cold, heat, spinning, brain stimulation, and often, near-death), and then employs suggestion and/or classical and operant conditioning (consistent with well-established behavioral modification principles) to implant thoughts, directives, and perceptions in the unconscious mind, often in newly-formed trauma-induced dissociated identities, that force the victim to do, feel, think, or perceive things for the purposes of the programmer. The objective is for the victim to follow directives with no conscious awareness, including execution of acts in clear violation of the victim’s moral principles, spiritual convictions, and volition.

(http://endritualabuse.org/mind-control-simple-to-complex/)

One of the Aceh war's laeast examined aspects was Jakarta's strategic - and international - level infiltration and "black" (covert) operations against Acehenese resistance. Such infiltration activies related closely to the information of "Red and White" paramilitaries in both Aceh and East Timor cases. Unlike the East Timor case, Indonesian forces much less international oppisition over Aceh, because GAM enjoyed less foreign sympathy and support than FALINTIL. Nonetheless, such operations in both regions hand the same essential goals: division and destablization of both the resistance and its sources of civilian support. But in the rise of loyalist militias outside of East Timor from the late 1990s, not only in Aveh but Papua and elsewhere, obvious Indonesial jihadist elements were discernible within broader operations partly aimed at local and overseas perciptions.

Aceh's war saw Jakarta's use of culturally specific Islamist camouflage to aid deception processes. By the time of the post-2001 "Global War of Terror" (GWOT), this aspect assumed greater significance in Jakarta's Aceh infowar, hitherto directed more at local audiences. Close examination of Indonesian sources releaved that highly publicized regional "Jema'ah Islamiyah (JI)" terrorist group was connected to loyalist Indonesial elements, wheter as Acehenese or Aceh-related players. Compatible efforts in Aceh manifested more openly as syariah and its orthodox Islamist political and cultural trappings. (Indonesia's War Over Aceh: Last Stand on Mecca's Porch, p. 195).

"Terrorism" here is not a stric definition, but rather a conventionalized keyword as attributed to non-state agents since attacks on mainland USA in 2001, and subsequent lesser events such as that on Bali in 2002 Vengeful reprisal strikes against Aceh's civilians amounted to "terrorism" by any reasonable understanding, whether in TNI-POLRI antiguerrilla sweeps and hostage-taking, or GAM assassination and kidnapping or alleged collaborators. Similiarly, "PSYOPS" here denoes Jakarta's more sensitive, sophisticated, and aggressive manipulation of perceptions, but at strategic levels beyong such counterintelligence activily within Aceh. "Infiltration" covers the turning of GAM members usually upon compromise from interrogations, searches, capture and coercion on families, as seen in operational-level covert action. Strategiically, "infiltration" applies also to the creatin and sponsorship of so-called "splinter" groups to undermine GAM and its civilian support networks, especially overseas. Related terms covering all of the abose aspects are "black flag", "false flag", and "black PSYOPS", denoting covert "front" entities, their activity in infiltration and aggressive PSYOPS, deception plans, and other disinformation run to destablize an enemy outside of normal combat. (Indonesia's War Over Aceh: Last Stand on Mecca's Porch, p. 196).

Trump's PNAC Global Agenda, Proxy 'war' between Soros and Trump, Phony Wars and Muppet Government

Somehow people do belive the nationalism of Trump is a regret on treat of USA in the world, focusing only in common enemies, like China and North Korea, but recently had some atitudes that shown him as an american-global-unilateralist leader, muppet of bankers and big comporativists, that defends the world under corporations and debts, extracting the natural resources to them and starting wars to mantain its needs.

Also, a pupped for international banks, Bildeberg, Bohemian Groove and Rothschilds, that must mantain their interests on going, dividing the world in conflict zones and interest zones, initiating some conflicts that was already there, or creating new ones.

Trump is a part of the Comitee of 300, a toy for some of the lords, but very important anyway.

Also the plans for the neo-conservative Project for the New American Century enjoys the Trump administration to put USA globally leading, independente of UN decisions, and put the USA dictating the world direction, warfares or welfare state the nations must join.

The Project for the New American Century (PNAC), unleashed in June 1997, has largely disappeared from the political radar, yet the mire, murder and general mayhem the US, UK and dwindling “boots on the ground” allies find themselves in, are seemingly rooted in its aims, which march relentlessly on.

PNAC was founded under the Chairmanship of William Kristol, former Chief of Staff to Vice President Dan Quale during the Presidency of George Bush Snr. Kristol’s father, Irving Kristol has been described as the “Godfather of Neoconservatism.”

The organization was: “… dedicated to a few fundamental propositions: That American leadership is good for America and the world.” Projects were devised: “… to explain what American world leadership entails.”.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-neocons-project-for-the-new-american-century-american-world-leadership-syria-next-to-pay-the-price/5305447

As Syria before and, always, North Korea, the Proxy War between USA and another country is always contantly. China is a superopower and USA must also provoke to make a ballance of power in extreme Asia. The North Korea is the Proxy War between them, also, the largest mineral reservations of Thorium is over there.

“They are, as I’ve said before, a proxy for China – a nuclear proxy – we cannot have that, and we’re going to have to, and I still believe, over the next six months to a year, we are going to have to come to a head on this because it’s unacceptable for the United States to have a nuclear ICBM North Korea.”

Another warning from the rogue state’s neighbours, South Korea, claims Kim Jong-un’s threats come because he wants global “recognition”.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/845260/North-Korea-news-nuclear-proxy-for-China-United-States-Donald-Trump-resolve-threat

North Korea and South Korea always lived under conflict that, for sure, menaces the neighboors, like Japan, and is complex because of Chinese support. But USA simply decided to act two or three fronts, like the attack on Syria and maneouvers in Japan and Korean sea, to demonstrate power in North Korea, at the time they started a Proxy War in Syria, to provoke Russia.

Declared enemy of USA, never before Kim was under a constantly paranoia, since Trump started to talk about free the Asia from the menace of Kim. We had never so many nuclear tests in a short time period before.

By this paranoia, he decided to excercise a war that he is not capable to support, like creating fake propaganda of military machinery and keeps showing to the world the idea of North Korea can have the capability to target USA.

The Phony Wars is a strategy of himself to keep the country closed to the international affairs and mantain the aliances between the oriental intimate governments and keeps acting like a silly dictatorship roleplaying.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3343213/kim-jong-uns-terrifying-new-missiles-are-fake-and-north-korea-is-trying-to-fool-the-world/

http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/39732404/fake-war-north-korea-and-a-history-of-dummy-weapons

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4449754/US-military-expert-says-North-Korea-parade-arms-FAKE.html

In December Mr. Kim announced a truce to South Korea, and a possible cease fire, but keeps the treats to the USA.

It’s a normal action beyond the capacity of the country, because if they open Market to West, the local Market could fail the country economy and this bankrupt can be refund with international Money. Not good for the extreme country politician.

According to New York Times:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/31/world/asia/north-korea-kim-jong-un-olympics.html

North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un, moved Monday to ease his country’s isolation by offering to send a delegation to the Winter Olympics in South Korea next month, even as he claimed to have accomplished the ability to launch a nuclear missile at the mainland United States. 

... 

“I am willing to send a delegation and take necessary measures, and I believe that the authorities of the North and South can urgently meet to discuss the matter,” Mr. Kim said in his annual New Year’s Day speech, broadcast on North Korea’s state-run television. “We sincerely hope that the South will successfully host the Olympics.” 

“Above all, we must ease the acute military tensions between the North and the South,” Mr. Kim said. “The North and the South should no longer do anything that would aggravate the situation, and must exert efforts to ease military tensions and create a peaceful environment.”

Acording to Time:

http://time.com/5118046/donald-trump-davos/

For one, there is the unrivaled U.S. military. For another, there is the U.S. economy, still larger than any other. But then there’s the U.S. President, who in the name of making the country great again has renounced the global architecture that the U.S. designed, championed and dominated for generations. It’s the very international system that did so much to cement American greatness in the first place. Pulling out of it won’t be easy–kind of like playing Jenga wearing mittens–if it’s possible at all. But Donald Trump has gone about trying with brio. 

... 

What exactly is Davos? There has never been a photograph that shows the place clearly, which is actually fitting, inasmuch as the ski resort is synonymous with the faceless forces that steer life on earth. “Globalism” takes in the world all at once–one market, one ecology, one shared responsibility. And its rise has coincided with amazing progress: in 1981, 44% of the world’s population was living in extreme poverty. Today it’s 10%. 

... 

Which means Trump should be right at home. He won the presidency by flamboyantly exploiting the chasm between the supremely assured global elite (including the Clinton Foundation) and the deep unease of U.S. workers who have lived with stagnant wages during the four decades that Davos has existed. The loss of factory jobs to low-wage countries cast the matter in patriotic terms. “At the bedrock of our politics,” Trump said in his Inaugural, “will be a total allegiance to the United States of America.” 

The problem is what to do about it in a world the U.S. not only built but built to last. Globalism’s core is the capitalist system that prevailed in the Cold War by bankrupting the Soviets, and then coaxed Communist China to transform itself into something new: a market-based economy topped by an authoritarian order. A year ago it was Chinese President Xi Jinping who made a star turn at Davos, delivering a robust defense of open trade with the zeal of a convert. “The global economy is the big ocean you cannot escape from,” Xi said, adding, of China, “We have learned how to swim.” 

... 

Thus did the world’s oldest democracy yield back to Europe at least rhetorical defense of the Enlightenment on which the U.S. was founded, including the 18th century notions that inspired first the Declaration of Independence and then the Constitution: tolerance, liberty, progress and, not least, reason. There does not appear to be much of that in Trump’s effort to withdraw from the world.

Well, under this menace, and Middle East migration, the bankrupt of some nations is explored.

There is not a real war nowadays happening, as it is a secular war, ethnical or social warfare, that is financed by U.S.A. and Israel in Middle East to promove the migration to Europe. Let's not be so direct...

Trump also declared on Davos a globalist agenda.

Acording to Los Angeles Times:

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-fg-trump-davos-speech-20180126-story.html

Contrary to predictions that Trump might use his keynote address to the World Economic Forum in Davos to bash multilateral trade deals and international alliances, as he did during his campaign, he appeared to soften the edges of his "America First" policy in his speech to the elites who gather in this glitzy Alpine resort each winter to champion free trade and global cooperation.  

"America is open for business and we are competitive once again," Trump told several hundred attendees, reading his speech from teleprompters. "Now is the perfect time to bring your business, your jobs and your investments to the United States." 

... 

"I've been a cheerleader for our country," Trump said in his speech, which largely echoed familiar White House talking points. "And everybody representing a company or a country has to be a cheerleader, or no matter what you do, it's just not going to work." 

... 

Trump accused "some countries" of exploiting the international trading system at the expense of others. He said he supports free trade, but it "needs to be fair and it needs to be reciprocal.

Acording to the CBC:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trump-the-populist-descends-on-globalist-davos-1.4502287

Laura Dawson, director of the Canada Institute at the Wilson Center in Washington, D.C., says that leaders like Trump like to crow about how well their economy is doing and give full credit to their nationalist plans — but fail to credit the deep ties that link countries together.  

"All of the world's leaders, virtually, are celebrating the improvement and recovery in the global economy, but it's also giving space for the nationalists and populists to say, 'Hey this is because of our 'America first' or 'U.K. first' policies," said Dawson. 

"But it's been a lot of globalistic tendencies, economic integration, economic co-operation that has helped to produce this economic recovery."  

...  

National Economic Council Director Gary Cohn is also in Davos. At a White House press briefing on Tuesday, Cohn framed the president's America first agenda in a more global light.  

"America first is not America alone," Cohn said. "When we grow, the world grows. When the world grows, we grow. We're part of it, and we're part of a world economy and the president believes that."

There is a need to keep the global capitalism and economic liberalism under the control and influence of the USA, and some countries keep it harsh, so under the circumstances, the illegitimate conflicts, local ones, sometimes tribal, militia conflicts became an act of global terrorism, being financed by governments and bankers, investitors and contractors causing bigger problems.

According to the New Yorker, Soros told, about the Trump in Davos:

https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/how-george-soros-upstaged-donald-trump-at-davos

... 

“I find the current moment in history rather painful,” he said at the outset of his remarks. “Open societies are in crisis, and various forms of dictatorships and mafia states, exemplified by Putin’s Russia, are on the rise. In the United States, President Trump would like to establish a mafia state, but he can’t, because the Constitution, other institutions, and a vibrant civil society won’t allow it.” 

If the resilience of the U.S. system was encouraging, Soros intimated, there were still grave dangers to be faced, including the rise of authoritarianism in places like Hungary and the fact that under Trump “the United States is set on a course toward nuclear war by refusing to accept that North Korea has become a nuclear power.” This refusal had created an incentive for North Korea “to develop its nuclear capacity with all possible speed,” Soros argued, which in turn “may induce the United States to use its nuclear superiority preëmptively” and start a nuclear war. The only solution, he added, was to “come to terms with North Korea as a nuclear power.”

...

In economic terms, Soros suggested, the tech giants were making excessive profits and stifling innovation. And their behavior was also causing larger social and political problems. Social-media companies “deliberately engineer addiction to the services they provide,” he noted. “This can be very harmful, particularly for adolescents.” In this sense, tech companies were similar to casinos that “have developed techniques to hook gamblers to the point where they gamble away all their money, even money they don’t have.”

According to DailyMail:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5314897/George-Soros-calls-Trump-blistering-Davos-speech.html

'I consider the Trump administration a danger to the world,' the billionaire investor said in his speech. 

'But I regard it as a purely temporary phenomenon that will disappear in 2020, or even sooner.' Soros predicted a Democratic 'landslide' in the 2018 elections.  

'I give President Trump credit for motivating his core supporters brillaintly, but for every core supporter he has created a greater number of core opponents who are The businessman-turned philanthropist has been a consistent critic of Trump who is also in Davos, the first US president to attend since Bill Clinton in 2000. 

Trump found a softer way to package his 'America First' agenda he strode through the conference center on his first day in Davos, calling for prosperity and 'great peace'. 

'I think the real message is we want great prosperity and we want great peace,' Trump said after holding back-to-back meetings with British Prime Minister Theresa May and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The lack of respect for local culture influenced these local conflicts to a level of terror and genocide, and this need to a "protector" made the local population to search for a safe place.

The Migration Crisis in Europe, from Middle East, was financed by USA and Israel, some banks interested in local geopolitics, influence in local investitors and environments.

Create a network with local banks and, for the lack of credibility of them, international financers and bankers.

This makes the population under control of drug dealers, mercenaries, bankers, debts, multiculturalist schools and organized crime.

New conflicts are about to come. Turkey can be a next card, North Korea is on Target. Syria has already became a conflict zone to provoke Russia and Iran.

"Not for the first time there are dire warnings of a direct US-Russia confrontation in Syria that could escalate, in the worst case, into a third world war. What is going on has echoes of the proxy conflicts fought by the superpowers during the latter stages of the cold war, but with added elements of risk because the accepted rules and formal channels of communication to a large extent no longer exist."

Russia’s objectives in Syria have been clear from the start of its overt military intervention in September 2015 (even if the US and some of its allies refused to see them). It is true that as a longtime ally of Syria since cold-war times, Russia feels a certain loyalty to Assad. It is true, too, that it sees Syria as a place where it can regain some of the influence the Soviet Union had in the Middle East. But these considerations have always been secondary to its determination to keep Syria together as a unified state. To Moscow, Iraq and Libya stand as models for what Syria must be helped to avoid. Russia’s loyalty was only extended to Assad as he was the one person able to keep Syria together. Had a single opposition force emerged, Russia might well have left him to swing in the wind. But the opposition has never been united enough to present a credible alternative – even with the help it received from the US and others. Moscow has put pressure on Assad to accept elections and some form of power-sharing, but the military conflict must be over first. Its priority remains the unity and governability of Syria.

The US position, in contrast, looks inconsistent, to put it politely. While Barack Obama was president, the US supported a variety of opposition groups, and insisted – though the then-secretary of state, John Kerry, showed some flexibility – that Assad’s departure was a precondition for any settlement. Combating Isis was both part of the same purpose and distinct. It was thought that the election of Donald Trump could presage a sharp change in Syria policy. On the one hand, his hope of improving relations with Russia suggested the possibility of a settlement jointly underwritten. On the other, Trump had pledged to keep the US out of foreign wars and seemed not to regard Syria as a vital US interest. It seemed possible that the US would stand by as Assad capitalised on his victory at Aleppo and hastened to reassert control over the rest of the country. The US policy change, though, never really happened. The rapprochement with Moscow never even began, because of the hue and cry against Russia in Washington. Trump decided – or was persuaded – to enforce a “red line” that had been Obama’s, not his, and launched an air strike on a Syrian government airfield in response to evidence of a chemical attack on civilians. US support for rebel groups continued, to the point where the Syrian warplane was shot down by US forces last weekend. At the very least there are mixed messages here.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jun/21/syria-war-endgame-us-russia-conflict-washington-moscow-accidental-war

http://www.businessinsider.com/how-to-stop-the-us-and-russias-proxy-war-in-syria-2015-12

At the end, there is a globalist agenda in everyway, socialist or neoliberal, Trump or Hillary were both a puppet of the globalist agenda. Trump was before a showman, he was involved in TV shows, businessman, sexual scandals and involved with the richest families in the world, it's a very good trick to media control under the circumstances of manipulate the world to a socialist agenda. The globalist Fabian agenda needs the capitalism and the environment under the control of the bankers, to keep the population slaves of the debts.

Freedom of speech and press is just a lie, to people belive that it's all under the democratic control.

George Soros was provoket at the new New World Order, when the idea was to finance the socialist State concentrated in the phylantropic societies and economic murdering, creating an expectation to a peaceful world.

For Trump had been a puppet before and maybe, he got an idea of which step to follow right now.

According to the SputnikNews:

https://sputniknews.com/politics/201701261050016570-trump-foiled-soros-world-order-tpp-plan/

Wall Street hedge fund manager and financial analyst Mitch Feierstein claims that Donald Trump came to power just in time to prevent billionaire George Soros and Bill and Hillary Clinton achieve a Trans Pacific free trade deal hidden from the public.  

President Donald Trump came to power just in time to prevent billionaire George Soros and Bill and Hillary Clinton achieve a Trans Pacific free trade deal hidden from the public, Wall Street hedge fund manager and financial analyst Mitch Feierstein told Sputnik. 

“George Soros and Clinton Inc. were nearly able to declare ‘Mission Accomplished’ on their vision of establishing an opaque ‘New World Order’,” Feierstein, a hedge fund manager who has spent 38 years working in the New York, Tokyo and London global financial markets, said on Tuesday.

In a part, both globalist extremists, under phylantropic peaceful investments, socialist agenda or liberal conservative and neoliberal agenda, or fabian socialist UN agendas, also the PNAC are interested on make the world under a leader government, not natioanlist, but under a world army financed by international banks and business companies capable to supress the civilitaion to their needs.

Who the real globalists are

Brazil is the "time ball" now.

Land was always an experiment of worlwide politics and international government and freemasons. Explored in prostitution, new diseases, economics, etc. Nowadays, the country is bankrupt.

Politicians are involved in global schemes of globalism, international communism and  even the right wing ones, with the american way of life.

War on terror was an excuse to invade middle east and appropriate their resources. North Korea has many of the Uranium they need, because the biggest reservers of Thorium (read this) are settled in North Korea, as the oil was in Iraq and in Brazil the Niobium.

Now country is divided into two views, the conservative ones, involved into worldwide global politics and liberal economy, and left wings, involved into communism and international movements of mutual help. Both globalists...

They accuse Russia on being the leftist wing, international enemy of the natioanlism, but who are into 'worldwide protection', who internationalized the money, creating the need of everyone to use? Who invaded the other's lands when the neocolonialism, even cold war, had already finished?

This world elite comes from rich families, originating from Europe's west, based in desert spiritual model of metaphisics and religion, spreading all over the world as the one and only truth, and the need of influential thoughts into society as behavioral and cultural.

Breaking the idea of nationalism, love for the country, or using this as a paradoxal axiom, spawning a enemy side as they, obscurely, produce the same idea of enslavement.

Be nationalist, be autonomous...

There's  country that most corrupted nations to make the earth inhabitants under their control, starting to the need of comsumpting it's own money. They used the influence of international organizations like the World Bank, They Royal Institute of the International Affairs, Council of Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Comission, Bildeberg Group, United Nations, NATO, non governamental organisms, with the intention of subjulgate the massess by the corporations, needs of comsumption, need for the basic needs such as food, water, clothes. Enslavement by religion. The prostitution, drug spread, etc.

This government is ruled by the same small group of an elite that ruled for a long time. This elite is descends of kings, world monarchs, bankers, robber barons, priests, warlords oligarcs, and media representatives. These are the architects and instigators behind the formation, information and implementation of this order.

The world is desired to become a feudal state again, ruled by these few involved.

We live under a legislation of social democracy, even based on costumes, the legal basis protect the ones who are involved into this agenda. The poor education and the failed economy, economic assistance, philantropy and the media covert are a model of destablization of society and continuity of this politics.