When Parvulesco once told that that gravity center of the planeraty geopolitics is being in the Europe, concerning the enforces to the imperial Europe integration, the idea is to suppose that the cultural center and the traditional center of the world diplomacy and geopolitics is there.
Parvulesco was European, so, it's sure that he would write to Europeans, exactly like Morghentau, that wrote to USA. This project still remotes to Euro-centrism, but in a case that, each civilization must restore the traditions, their own grail and promote a kind of cultural revolution, with the pre-christian values. This project still realizes that the axis trans-continental Paris-Berlin-Moscow, stablishes a core of the whole diplomacy.
Parvulesco assures that the politics are conspirational, where the most of the actions at it's conjunture is done in the shadows, by elitist bankers, philosophers, ministers of defense and international interests, traying to promote misinformation and dumbing the society to promote the atention to USA, with project of the International Socialism, trying to put the Globalists in power and control the core of Europe.
This enforce was well done, puting the same kind of politics of Russia as socialist as it was in 70's, and put the German politics at the same way of a socialist internationalist, and promoting USA as the savior of the capitalism in the world, also the one capable to promote the idea of freedom of unity.
This politics of misinformation transforms the Russia, Germany, China and the Arab countries in an trans-caontinental aliance against the USA, promoting a secret abrupt attack against them. The idea is to put USA in a superpower of a second class, not like in the 90s, after the Cold War.
This Eurasian plan exists for sure. The arm races and arms control is normal in the relations between the countries, each country must arm themselves more than others, to promote subsjulgation of other nations. The problem is that judeo-christian economic politics and global domination politics coudl fail at the countries that promotes the idea of Guénon and Evola, also Parvulesco, traditionalism, that could restore pre-christian values and destroy the influence of these shadow empires that influence the International Relations, promoting nationalist governments.
Every analyst knows that christianity is a religion that preaches the enslavement, a base of society, hierarchically suffocated by a leader, who promisses spiritual salvation, as the idea of communism, where the states suffocate the society.
The problem of the west is that, every kind of international politics that don't come from the bureau of the USA is a "satanic" plan in oposition to democracy. But where is the 'democracy' when a country is threatened with sanctions and military operations when just disagrees?
The geo-strategic plan of Eurasianism exists. Officialy finished in 1921, inspired the sphere of Haushoffer's Geopolitik, but restored with the idea of Dugin-Limonov, with a kind of ultra-right-Bolchevism.
Parvulesco agrees that this European Axis representes a battle, kind spiritual battle, remoting the ancient battles before the legality of an international organism, than, this politic must be driven by a politic of two entities. First is a fake politic to promote peaceful conditions. This politic was seem in the 90's and 00's first half of decade, when the Russia was still not armed yet. The other is a revolutionary politic, shadowy, just like the Bilderberg's politics, or the Trilateralists, but promoting an revolutionary action, invisible to the other side's. The book called Star of an Invisible Empire, the promotion of the Occult Parliament.
Parvulesco vision is tragic. Comparing to occultists and theosophers, he doesn't take an idea of neo-mysticism. Parvulesco's going beyond the skepticism, don't beliving that the world can be really a peaceful place, condemining the world to a materialistic view of the Kali Yuga. Going witha prophetice level of revelation, the antencity of his vision don't accept the spiritual weak-explained concept of Christianity, and the superficial concept of the Orthodox Christian church is promoted by Satanists, as the west church preaches. Parvulesco's message preaches tat the end of time is promoted by invisible projection, promoting an apocalyptic moment, because the humans forgot its spiritual nature, gone in disagree with natural world and felt. Humanity is sleeping in darkness, full of materialistic illusions, and promoted the secret brotherhoods, orders of peopel who must control the environment and the society, with misinformations and phony wars, to control the population.
He clearly and paradoxicaly summarized a diality of a process, duplicating or quadruplicating the figures of a transcendental world's politics as its restores spiritual values of an old empire, and it promotes an idea of "Europe of the End". The idea of Nation before the Naions, transcending legacy of the Indo-European nation, former of the origins of the actual human.
These secret agents of being and nonexistence appeared in all spheres of control of the modern world, directing the process of civilization, resulting the history, on a superimposition of the polarity of the dual. These vectors of the occult nets, factories the actual concrete history. Mlitary, Terrorism, Spies, Poets, Philosophers, Techers, Media in general, Presidents, Churches, Freemasons, works as actors to promote the conspiracy of a drama, and circling the new actors to join them, and pass this reality to a new generation. This new generation will continue the previos works, but with no idea of why is doing, and so it goes, that's why new generations cannot surpass the previous.
Conspiracy drama... this political level of conspiracy resists to a new age, with infiltration to this nets of a planetary conspiracy, instigation of metapolitics and forces opposing the mondialism/globalism. That's why there are lots of new groups of terrorists, understanding that new world is living under chaos, and under a constant destruction of values, of moral or ideological values, that promotes an intern revolt in individuals, instigating politics forming new clans.
This conspiracy promotes new heroes, anti-heroes, new religion understandings and interpretations, and stablished a world order opposing to americanism, liberalism, and teh aristocratic families that loathes democracy secretly wishing for an end of the liberal age.
Read more at:
https://www.eurasiareview.com/08092012-putins-eurasianist-revolution-myth-or-reality-analysis/
https://www.counter-currents.com/2012/10/the-empire-of-the-enda-brief-introduction-to-jean-parvulesco/
It is a common notion today that geopolitics is a science of gas and oil pipelines about which you can immediately learn everything from the on line articles starting with an image of Vladimir Putin, a pipeline or a Russian jet. This is not by accident, because, as we see from the above Dugin quote, one of the main purposes of this technique is communicating complex information to the consumer by simplifying, that is: dumbing it down to the level of an average news consumer.
The other, somewhat less common, notion is that geopolitics is a method of politics based on taking into account geography as a cause and condition of political actions, encompassing a wide spectrum of social, economic, political and military decisions. In this sense, every unit of international politics, i.e. a more or less autonomous state or (con)federation thereof has, or at least should have, an ability to make geopolitical decisions.
This seems like a common sense point of view and many Western observers are being (self)duped into thinking that it is precisely what geopolitics means. Moreover, the idea is quite appealing because it provides the observer with a sense of stability and the timelessness of principles sorely lacking in the chaos of postmodern politics. More often than not it serves as a “gateway drug” to uncritical advocacy of Russian foreign policy and, if untreated, to duginitis chronica.
However, this is not what geopolitics is. On the contrary, this is what it is:
“Geopolitics is a worldview and as such it is not prudent to compare it to science but to the system of sciences. It is on the same level with Marxism, Liberalism, etc., that is: explanatory systems of society and history that extrapolate the most important principle as their criteria and then reduce all innumerable aspects of man and nature to it. (. . .) In contrast to “economical ideologies” it is founded on the thesis: “geographical conditions as destiny”. Geography and space in geopolitics serve the same function that money and means of production serve in Marxism and Liberalism - all undamental aspects of human being are reduced to them, they are the main method of explaining the past, the main factors of human being, around which all other aspects of existence are being organized. ” (FG, ch. 1 “Definition of geopolitics", pg. 23-24)
So, is geopolitics an ideology - a reductionist all-explanatory system that serves the purpose of correspondingly reductionist - and correspondingly totalitarian - politics, like Marxism and Liberalism? Well, yes and no. It is all that but it is still much, much more:
“The fact of man being conditioned by space - the fundamental thesis of geopolitics - becomes visible only when a certain distancing from the individual has been undertaken. This is why geopolitics - regardless of its fundamental presuppositions - never became an ideology as such or, to be more precise: “a mass ideology”. Its conclusions and methods, objects of its investigations and fundamental theses are comprehensible only to those social instances concerned with all encompassing problems - strategic planning, investigating the global social and historical laws, etc.
(. . .) The geopolitics is a worldview of those in power, the science of those that rule and for those that rule (Serbian word “vlast” denotes at the same time “governance” and “those in power”, with the emphasis on “those in power” - a testament to the melancholic wisdom of Balkan’s linguistics. The literal English rendering of “governance” would miss Dugin’s point completely, KT). Only insofar as one is approaching the top social strata (i.e. the elites, KT) geopolitics starts to make sense for him (. . .) while before it was merely an abstraction. Geopolitics is a discipline belonging to political elites (...). Without pretending to scientific rigor, geopolitics on its own level is free to decide what is and what is not significant. Humanities and natural sciences are being applied only when they don’t contradict the fundamental principles of geopolitical method. Geopolitics is in certain sense free to choose the sciences (. . .) that seem useful, disregarding others. In the contemporary world it represents a “comprehensive handbook of the overlords”, the textbook of those who rule, providing an abridgement of those things that should be kept in mind when global (destiny-making) decisions are being made (...) Geopolitics is the science of how to rule (emphasis by Dugin).
Precisely this geopolitical horizontal is what Dugin argues for in the programmatic part of Foundations of Geopolitics we’ll focus on in the second part of our analysis.
And, to finish on an occult note after all, let us hear what this Empire of the End would look like:
(...)
“During one of our conversations, when I was explaining the meaning of the term ours’ (nashi, KT) in Russian political terminology, Parvulesco lit up and showed me the place in one of his early novels (mid-1970’s), where he providentialy uses the same term in an amazingly similar fashion. ‘Ours’ for his were members of the ‘conspiracy of Being’, secret network of agents of influence, who are united by a common occult goal to the other side of political disagreements and which resist the cosmopolitical and profane civilization being established on the planet. More than that, my Italian friends sent me a copy of Parvulesco’ s article from the late 1960’s, in which he talked about ‘eurasianism’, geopolitical project of the Continental Bloc, about the necessity of a Russian-German alliance (reanimation of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact), and even about the necessity of rapprochement between the reds and the browns in a united, revolutionary, antimondialist front! (. . .) Besides the disdainful and pejorative term “red-brown, ” which has long been used to label the most interesting political forces in Russia, there exists a royal shade of this color - as a final eschatological coronation with Alchemical Gold of the great continental Eurasian Revolution, which ‘ours,’ secret and obvious ‘agents of Being’ are preparing and implementing today. Another character of the sacral tradition is represented by this color. We are talking about the Hindu god Shiva, liturgicaly called ‘red-brown’ and ‘frightening. ’ The personality of this god is close to the element of our red-browns.
Yes, this element is frightening and devastating in its external manifestation. But it is exactly the terrible, red-brown Shiva that serves as the protector of the mystery of Eternity, opening in its completeness at the moment of the End of Time, negating with its ‘terrible’ appearance the beginning of the “era of Aquarius.” Red-brown Shiva - is the guardian of tradition of sacral Love, Tantra. That Tantra, to which Jean Parvulesco devoted one of his first books, ‘The Merciful Crown of Tantra. ’
Agents of the inner Continent are awake. Already there appears on the night sky of our sickening civilization a magic Star, heralding the soon-to-be transformation of the Internal into the External. This - is the Star of an Invisible Empire, Empire of Jean Parvulesco (source).
https://archive.org/stream/TheInvisibleEmpireIntroductionToAlexanderDuginsFoundationsOfGeopoliticsPt1/en.kalitribune.com-The+Invisible+Empire+Introduction+to+Alexander+Dugins+Foundations+of+Geopolitics+pt+1+%281%29_djvu.txt
