FaceApp is a product for stealing data and promote governmental tracking and projection for future intelligence operations

The real project of Facebook is to map people around the world and project the possible future of them, tracking people around the world by facial reconigtion.

After the 10 years challenge, the company projected the possible aging from now on, and traced a probability of future, based on previous particular signs in people's faces. What happened is that FaceApp projected the future, the possibility of exchange sexual gender, making possibility of traces possible future daughters and sons, trace younger faces, reconizing previous actions, but the older instant app is the most interesting and more real trace.

The reality is that, from now, Facebook sold the informations to companies to business enterprises, searching the possibility of future customers, and giving information to advertisers, for possible money exchange on business, service and governmental/security level of map society.

some of the silliest advisers tells it's a Russian consultancy to promote a world wide tracking, but the reality is that the servers and the clouds are in USA and the sided Facebook, Instagram, advisers are interested in the information that FaceApp is promoting. FaceApp is tracking in Russia, but the Amazon servers will hardly have the information given to Russia intelligence, while Facebook is tracking these informations for a long time.

The high level military intelligence is promoted by a civilian app that is put to download and spread like virus in society, adopted first by actors and celebrities gone to a new level of viral use, and information and data stealing, while you give permission to the app access your photos and informations, the cell phone number and the e-mail information.

The Data will be processed in an international server and will save your data with your interested photo to proccess and save it for future use for a political and military intelligence.

Than the promotion of drug market, political tracking, interested on security and military psyops operation, will open sources to new level of controlling the interest of population, as the asthetic program of beauty products, marked of drugstores, asthetic surgeries, previous depression picture figuring how politics will be used to enslave the population to a possible massive mind control program.

But governments will be more interested on it, to promote future operations of possible treatening on national security.

Previously the government and military should have your picture and use intelligence to trace personal signals to create a possible sketch, but now, the own society is giving this information, with the possibility of use of beard, take off beard, age, chance hairs colors, etc.

What can companies and criminals do with your data from FaceApp?

https://www.tellerreport.com/tech/2019-07-16---what-can-companies-and-criminals-do-with-your-data-from-faceapp--.HyG070EjZS.html

With the popular FaceApp you can look older on photos, but you also give your photos and personal information to a company that can sell them. What exactly can the buyers of this information do with it?

With the popular FaceApp you can look older on photos, but you also give your photos and personal information to a company that can sell them. What exactly can the buyers of this information do with it?

What is FaceApp?

FaceApp is a popular smartphone app that allows you to place a filter on selfies. This allows you to see, for example, what you would look like as an old man or woman. The popularity of the app has grown in recent weeks and is also being used by many celebrities.

What exactly does FaceApp collect?

FaceApp collects and saves all photos that users take. In addition, data that identifies your phone is also stored, along with cookies, log files, your location and your app use.

What does FaceApp do with this data?

All your data is shared with "companies in a group that FaceApp is part of, or companies that can later join this group". They are officially used to improve the services of all these companies.

Because other parties can freely join this group, in theory every company has access to the data. This allows an external party to also buy your data. FaceApp does not disclose which institutions have been allowed to look at the data so far.

Could that data be misused?

If the FaceApp data falls into the wrong hands, it can be used to sketch an extensive profile of your online behavior. Your photo and the identification code of your phone can be linked to data from, for example, data leaks, to identify your interests. Even leaked e-mail addresses, credit cards and passwords can be linked to this profile.

By sharing cookies from your device, even your surfing behavior on the internet could be mapped. Such data can be misused for, for example, identity theft or espionage.

Does this really happen?

No specific situations are known in which data from FaceApp were misused by, for example, crime. However, the amount of processed data and the privacy conditions make this possible in theory.

Cyber ​​criminals have in the past exploited leaked data in a similar way to, for example, steal identities or hack accounts.

Surely tech companies collect data more often? Why is there so much fuss at FaceApp?

FaceApp is made by Wireless Labs, a company based in Russia. The company does not have a European office, which makes it difficult to invoke the European privacy law. The company is probably not responding to requests to hand over or delete your data. In addition, FaceApp will not tell you where your data is at the moment.

The fact that the company is in Russia is also a source of suspicion among critics. Government hackers in the country have been accused several times of hacking attacks and attempts to spread disinformation on social media. Antivirus company Kaspersky even had to move its headquarters from Russia, after allegations that the company cooperates with the local government.

How do I prevent my data from being misused?

The data collected by FaceApp can no longer be removed from the company. You can choose to remove the app and no longer use it, to prevent Wireless Labs from collecting new data from you.

In addition, with future free apps it is wise to see where the creator is and what happens to data. An app's privacy statement often states what the developer collects and what it is used for. If a company is located in Europe, then the maker must adhere to a strict privacy law, which means you can always request that your data be deleted.

FaceApp: Are security concerns around viral app founded? | #TheCube

https://www.euronews.com/2019/07/17/faceapp-are-security-concerns-around-viral-app-founded-thecube

If you’ve been scrolling through Twitter, Instagram, or Facebook this week, chances are you have seen photographs of your friends looking older, younger, or even changing in gender overnight.

The app they are using, FaceApp, has been enjoying a boost in popularity this week and counts celebrities such as Drake and Gordon Ramsey among its 80 million users.

This week, it overtook Instagram and Whatsapp on the Apple App Store's top chart as the most downloaded app, prompting CEO Yaroslav Goncharov to post on Facebook: "Change, it's nice."

But many users on social media have raised concerns surrounding privacy and facial recognition — do these concerns have any basis?

What is FaceApp?

FaceApp was founded in 2017 by Wireless Lab, a company based in St Petersburg, Russia. That year, the app was widely criticized for “racist” selfie filters; an option labelled as “hot” seemingly lightened users’ skin tones.

A few months later, users were outraged to see that the app had introduced a series of “ethnicity change” filters, where users could alter photos to appear “black,” “Indian,” or “Asian.”

Two years on, the app was back in the spotlight and some social media users were wondering why it has gone viral, seemingly out of nowhere.

One rumour that was circulating alleged the app may be grabbing users’ photos from their phones and uploading them to the FaceApp server without asking.

While there is as yet no evidence to support these claims, people took to Twitter to voice concerns.

What does FaceApp's privacy policy say?

FaceApp states in its privacy policy that they use “third-party analytics tools” which “collect information sent by your device or our Service, including the web pages you visit, add-ons, and other information that assists us in improving the Service.”

The policy highlights that the purpose of this is to “measure traffic and usage trends for the Service,” and reiterates that "we will not rent or sell your information to third parties outside FaceApp.”

But in the same section it is also written that the app shares information with “third-party organizations that help us provide the Service to you” and deliver targeted ads.

The privacy policy, French security researcher Baptiste Robert told Euronews, is "pretty vague".

However, he also said: "We don’t have an answer in the how [photos are stored] but we can see that only the photo you are working on is uploaded to their servers.

"They are not uploading the gallery of the user to their server, only the current photo."

However, Robert highlighted that the company is not General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) compliant, "which is an issue."

GDPR safeguards EU citizens' personal online data. It states that to be able to use an app, an account must be made on the app — FaceApp, however, does not require an account for users to process their pictures.

What has FaceApp said?

In a statement to Euronews, FaceApp said that only photos uploaded by the user are sent to the FaceApp cloud, where most of the photo processing for the app is performed.

“We never transfer any other images from the phone to the cloud,” the statement said.

A photo uploaded to the cloud may be stored for reasons of “performance and traffic,” and “most images are deleted from our servers within 48 hours from the upload date.”

The statement reiterated that FaceApp does not “sell or share any user data with any third parties,” adding.

“Even though the core R&D team is located in Russia, the user data is not transferred to Russia,” it added.

FaceApp also commented on concerns that photos from phone galleries were uploaded to their servers after a user granted access to the photos: “We don't do that. We upload only a photo selected for editing.”

To upload or not to upload?

James Whateley, a strategy partner with Digitas UK, weighed in on the issue, telling Euronews: "I just think there's something veering on the dishonest when an app parades itself as a bit of fun, not unlike your average ephemeral Snapchat filter, while quietly removing you of all your rights to your own likeness.

"The terms aren't that dissimilar to the Facebooks and Instagrams of this world but at least with them, you know what you're signing up for.

"With FaceApp, the value 'exchange' is not explicit at all. And there's no opt-out either."

Robert highlighted the danger of uploading photos to any app: "Uploading your face to a random app is a privacy nightmare. People shouldn’t do that."

FaceApp: Is The Russian Face-Aging App A Danger To Your Privacy?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2019/07/17/faceapp-is-the-russian-face-aging-app-a-danger-to-your-privacy/#5dcdbcfe2755

No, FaceApp isn’t taking photos of your face and taking them back to Russia for some nefarious project. At least that’s what current evidence suggests.

After going viral in 2017, and amassing more than 80 million active users, it’s blowing up again thanks to the so-called FaceApp Challenge, in which celebs (and everyone else) have been adding years to their visage with the app’s old-age filter. The app uses artificial intelligence to create a rendering of what you might look like in a few decades on your iPhone or Android device.

But one tweet set off a minor internet panic this week, when a developer warned that the app could be taking all the photos from your phone and uploading them to its servers without any obvious permission from the user.

The tweeter, Joshua Nozzi, said later he was trying to raise a flag about FaceApp having access to all photos, even if it wasn’t uploading them to a server owned by the Russian company.

Storm in an internet teacup?

This all turns out to be another of the Web’s many storm-in-teacup moments. A security researcher who goes by the pseudonym Elliot Alderson (real name Baptiste Robert) downloaded the app and checked where it was sending users’ faces. The French cyber expert found FaceApp only took submitted photos—those that you want the software to transform—back up to company servers.

And where are those servers based? Mostly America, not Russia. A cursory look at hosting records confirmed to Forbes that this was true: The servers for FaceApp.io were based in Amazon data centers in the U.S. The company told Forbes that some servers were hosted by Google too, across other countries, including Ireland and Singapore. And, as noted by Alderson, the app also uses third-party code, and so will reach out to their servers, but again these are based in the U.S. and Australia.

Of course, given the developer company is based in St. Petersburg, the faces will be viewed and processed in Russia. The data in those Amazon data centers could be mirrored back to computers in Russia. It’s unclear how much access FaceApp employees have to those images, and Forbes hadn’t received comment from the company at the time of publication about just what it does with uploaded faces.

So while Russian intelligence or police agencies could demand FaceApp hand over data if they believed it was lawful, they’d have a considerably harder time getting that information from Amazon in the U.S.

Permission to land on your phone

So is there a privacy concern? FaceApp could operate differently. It could, for instance, process the images on your device, rather than take submitted photos to an outside server. As iOS security researcher Will Strafach said: “I am sure many folks are not cool with that.”

It’s unclear how well FaceApp’s AI would process photos on the device rather than more powerful servers. FaceApp improves its face-changing algorithms by learning from the photos people submit. This could be done on the device, rather than the server, as machine learning features are available on Android and iOS, but FaceApp may want to stick to using its own computers to train its AI.

Users who are (understandably) concerned about the app having permission to access any photos at all might want to look at all the tools they have on their smartphone. It’s likely many have access to photos and an awful lot more. Your every move via location tracking, for instance. To change permissions, either delete the app, or go to app settings on your iPhone or Android and change what data tools are allowed to access.

FaceApp responds

Forbes contacted FaceApp founder Yaroslav Goncahrov, who provided a statement Wednesday morning. He said that user data is not transferred to Russia and that "most of the photo processing in the cloud."

"We only upload a photo selected by a user for editing. We never transfer any other images from the phone to the cloud," Goncharov added.

"We might store an uploaded photo in the cloud. The main reason for that is performance and traffic: we want to make sure that the user doesn't upload the photo repeatedly for every edit operation. Most images are deleted from our servers within 48 hours from the upload date."

He said that users can also request that all user data be deleted. And users can do this by going to settings, then support and opt to report a bug, using the word "privacy" in the subject line message. Goncahrov said this should help speed up the process.

And he added: "We don't sell or share any user data with any third parties."

Together FaceApp and Instagram, they are in order to steal your data and sell it to government to promote governmental programs and map soceity about geographical positions and projection of physical characteristics for future. 

A Webcam or a Front Camera conected to Internet can be revealed by military inteligence and trace your places, via connection, facial reconigtion and government strategy.

Viral App FaceApp Now Owns Access To More Than 150 Million People's Faces And Names

https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoetsier/2019/07/17/viral-app-faceapp-now-owns-access-to-more-than-150-million-peoples-faces-and-names/#6c69a25862f1

Everyone's seen them: friends posting pictures of themselves now, and years in the future.

Viral app FaceApp has been giving people the power to change their facial expressions, looks, and now age for several years. But at the same time, people have been giving FaceApp the power to use their pictures — and names — for any purpose it wishes, for as long as it desires.

And we thought we learned a lesson from Cambridge Analytica.

More than 100,000 million people have downloaded the app from Google Play. And FaceApp is now the top-ranked app on the iOS App Store in 121 countries, according to App Annie.

While according to FaceApp's terms of service people still own their own "user content" (read: face), the company owns a never-ending and irrevocable royalty-free license to do anything they want with it ... in front of whoever they wish:

You grant FaceApp a perpetual, irrevocable, nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide, fully-paid, transferable sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, publicly perform and display your User Content and any name, username or likeness provided in connection with your User Content in all media formats and channels now known or later developed, without compensation to you. When you post or otherwise share User Content on or through our Services, you understand that your User Content and any associated information (such as your [username], location or profile photo) will be visible to the public.

FaceApp terms of use

That may not be dangerous and your likeness may stay on Amazon servers in America, as Forbes has determined, but they still own a license to do whatever they want with it. That doesn't mean the app's Russian parent company, Wireless Labs, will offer your face to the FSB, but it does have consequences, as PhoneArena's Peter Kostadinov says:

You might end up on a billboard somewhere in Moscow, but your face will most likely end up training some AI facial-recognition algorithm.

Peter Kostadinov 

Whether that matters to you or not is your decision.

But what we have learned in the past few years about viral Facebook apps is that the data they collect is not always used for the purposes that we might assume. And, that the data collected is not always stored securely, safely, privately.

Once something is uploaded to the cloud, you've lost control whether or not you've given away legal license to your content. That's one reason why privacy-sensitive Apple is doing most of its AI work on-device.

And it's a good reason to be wary when any app wants access and a license to your digital content and/or identity.

As former Rackspace manager Rob La Gesse mentioned today:

To make FaceApp actually work, you have to give it permissions to access your photos - ALL of them. But it also gains access to Siri and Search .... Oh, and it has access to refreshing in the background - so even when you are not using it, it is using you.

Rob La Gesse

The app doesn't have to be doing anything nefarious today to make you cautious about giving it that much access to your most personal computing device.

The new soldiers of the world order are comming from the who controls the federal reserve - Obama the player who made Bankers attack Syria

America dropped 26,171 bombs in 2016. What a bloody end to Obama's reign

Medea Benjamin

According to new figures, the US dropped nearly three bombs every hour, 24 hours a day. Dare we think how Donald Trump will continue this legacy?

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/09/america-dropped-26171-bombs-2016-obama-legacy

Most Americans would probably be astounded to realize that the president who has been painted by Washington pundits as a reluctant warrior has actually been a hawk. The Iran nuclear deal, a herculean achievement, and the opening of diplomatic relations with Cuba unfortunately stand alone as President Obama’s successful uses of diplomacy over hostility.

While candidate Obama came to office pledging to end George W Bush’s wars, he leaves office having been at war longer than any president in US history. He is also the only president to serve two complete terms with the nation at war.

President Obama did reduce the number of US soldiers fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq, but he dramatically expanded the air wars and the use of special operations forces around the globe. In 2016, US special operators could be found in 70% of the world’s nations, 138 countries – a staggering jump of 130% since the days of the Bush administration. 

Looking back at President Obama’s legacy, the Council on Foreign Relation’s Micah Zenko added up the defense department’s data on airstrikes and made a startling revelation: in 2016 alone, the Obama administration dropped at least 26,171 bombs. This means that every day last year, the US military blasted combatants or civilians overseas with 72 bombs; that’s three bombs every hour, 24 hours a day.

While most of these air attacks were in Syria and Iraq, US bombs also rained down on people in Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan. That’s seven majority-Muslim countries.

One bombing technique that President Obama championed is drone strikes. As drone-warrior-in-chief, he spread the use of drones outside the declared battlefields of Afghanistan and Iraq, mainly to Pakistan and Yemen. Obama authorized over 10 times more drone strikes than George W Bush, and automatically painted all males of military age in these regions as combatants, making them fair game for remote controlled killing.

President Obama has claimed that his overseas military adventures are legal under the 2001 and 2003 authorizations for the use of military force passed by Congress to go after al-Qaida. But today’s wars have little or nothing to do with those who attacked the United States on September 11, 2001. 

The twisted legal architecture the Obama administration has constructed to justify its interventions, especially extrajudicial drone killings with no geographic restrictions, will now be transferred into the erratic hands of Donald Trump.

What does the administration have to show for eight years of fighting on so many fronts? Terrorism has spread, no wars have been “won” and the Middle East is consumed by more chaos and divisions than when candidate Barack Obama declared his opposition to the invasion of Iraq.

While the switch from US troops on the ground to airstrikes and special forces has saved US lives, untold numbers of foreign lives have been snuffed out. We have no idea how many civilians have been killed in the massive bombings in Iraq and Syria, where the US military is often pursuing Isis in the middle of urban neighborhoods. We only sporadically hear about civilian killings in Afghanistan, such as the tragic bombing of the Doctors Without Borders hospital in Kunduz that left 42 dead and 37 wounded.

Pushed to release information about civilian deaths in drone strikes, in July 2016 the US government made the absurd claim it had killed, at most, 116 civilians in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and Libya between 2009 and 2015. Journalists and human rights advocates said the numbers were ridiculously low and unverifiable, given that no names, dates, locations or others details were released. The London-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism, which has tracked drone strikes for years, said the true figure was six times higher.

Given that drones account for only a small portion of the munitions dropped in the past eight years, the numbers of civilians killed by Obama’s bombs could be in the thousands. But we can’t know for sure as the administration, and the mainstream media, has been virtually silent about the civilian toll of the administration’s failed interventions. 

In May 2013, I interrupted President Obama during his foreign policy address at the National Defense University. I had just returned from visiting the families of innocent people killed by US drone attacks in Yemen and Pakistan, including the Rehman children who saw their grandmother blown to bits while in the field picking okra. 

Speaking out on behalf of grieving families whose losses have never been acknowledged by the US government, I asked President Obama to apologize to them. As I was being dragged out, President Obama said: “The voice of that woman is worth paying attention to.”

Too bad he never did.

Map shows where President Barack Obama dropped his 20,000 bombs

Outgoing US leader carries out 3,000 more strikes in 2016 than year before

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-president-barack-obama-bomb-map-drone-wars-strikes-20000-pakistan-middle-east-afghanistan-a7534851.html

Incoming US President Donald Trump has said he will wage war on Isis, vowing to "bomb the s*** out of 'em".

And as the world gears up for a seemingly more violent four years, it is worth reflecting on President Obama's tenure

According to newly released figures, President Obama had already upped the number of bombs on foreign countries.

US forces dropped over 3,000 more bombs in 2016 than 2015, taking the grand total of strikes for the year to at least 26,171.

This map by Statista shows you where they were:

While President Obama reduced the number of US soldiers fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq, air-strikes proliferated under his leadership.

He expanded the use of unmanned air-strikes outside the confines of war-zones in Afghanistan and Iraq to countries including Pakistan and Yemen.

In the wake of Mr Trump's win, the value of arms companies soared. He has promised extravagant military parades through America's cities and, like many Republicans, vowed to build up the US military.

The figures are likely to be an underestimate, since the only reliable data only comes from a handful of countries, and multiple bombs can be classed as a single “strike” under the Pentagon's definition.

But of the confirmed bombings, the vast majority (24,287) took place in Iraq and Syria, according to analysis of official data by Micah Zenko, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.

His research concluded that the US dropped 79 per cent of all 30,743 coalition bombs in 2016.

Yet Democrat Mr Obama leaves the White House having authorised ten times more drone strikes than George W Bush and having been at war for longer than any President in US history.

'Peace' President? How Obama came to bomb seven countries in six years

US has engaged in conflict in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, Libya and now Syria

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/peace-president-how-obama-came-to-bomb-seven-countries-in-six-years-9753131.html

Barack Obama, the man many hoped would be the 'peace President' when he was elected, has bombed seven countries during his six years in office.

The US President oversaw the first US air strikes launched in Syria this week, in a huge escalation of America’s military campaign against Isis (also known as Islamic State).

Mr Obama was elected in 2009 partly of his opposition to the Iraq war and was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize after he assumed office.

The arguably optimistic decision taken by the Norwegian Nobel Committee was taken just nine months into his Presidency and came as he was trying to manage the war in Afghanistan.

His famous 'A New Beginning' speech in Cairo saw the President declare he was seeking a fresh start "between the United States and Muslims around the world", increasing hopes he would be the antidote to George W. Bush's controversial term.

Almost six years later, Mr Obama has approved military operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, Libya and now Syria.

The Bureau of Investigative Journalism (BIJ) estimates the Obama administration has launched more than 390 drone strikes in five years across Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia – eight times as many approved during the entire Bush Presidency.

Afghanistan

Mr Obama was at the forefront of a major withdrawal of troops in Afghanistan following America's ten-year conflict with the Taliban, which is due to finish at the end of 2014.

But in August, Afghan officials said an air strike by the American-led coalition killed at least four civilians, including two women.

Recently, Afghan President Hamid Karzai used his farewell speech to rally against US strikes one last time.

Mr Karzai, the only president Afghanistan had had since the US-led invasion in 2001, said Washington had wanted war in Afghanistan “because of its own interests”.

"The war in Afghanistan is to the benefit of foreigners," he said in his address. "But Afghans on both sides are the sacrificial lambs and victims."

Yemen

Drone strikes have had some success in tackling al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), with both the Pentagon and CIA operating drones over the country - at the expensive of civilian life.

Last year, Human Rights Watch released a 102-page report on US drone attacks and air strikes in Yemen against al- Qaeda militants which found six air strikes had killed 82 people - at least 57 of them civilians - between 2009 and 2013.

In April 2014, an intensive bombing campaign carried out jointly by US drones and Yemeni government forces left a reported 68 people dead, three of them believed to be civilians.

Pakistan

The US has targeted al-Qaeda and Taliban fighters in controversial drone “precision strikes” in Pakistan’s tribal areas for over a decade.

Mr Obama first admitted their use in 2012, saying: “For the most part, they’ve been very precise precision strikes against al-Qaeda and their affiliates, and we’re very careful in terms of how it’s been applied.”

But while the US claim strikes are an important tool for defeating anti-American targets, many in Pakistan say they undermine the country’s sovereignty and often hit innocent civilians.

The BIJ says that since Mr Obama's inauguration in 2009, the CIA has launched 330 strikes on Pakistan. In comparison, his predecessor Mr Bush conducted 51 strikes in four years.

Somalia

Mr Obama unveiled his “degrade and destroy” strategy against Isis on the anniversary of the 9/11 bombings. As he vowed to take out militants “wherever they exist”, he assured the conference: “This strategy of taking out terrorists who threaten us, while supporting partners on the front lines, is one that we have successfully pursued in Yemen and Somalia for years.”

The US has carried out several air strikes in Somalia recent years, killing a high-ranking al-Shabaab intelligence officer and its top explosives expert last year.

Libya

In 2011, a multi-state coalition was created in response to the Libyan civil war that saw American and British naval forces firing over 110 Tomahawk cruise missiles on Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi's air defences.

President Obama was forced to defend his decision to intervene in the Libya conflict with air strikes  after being accused of not properly consulting Congress.

Iraq

On 10 September this year and after ending the US combat presence in Iraq, Mr Obama became the fourth US President in a row to announce air strikes in the country in a televised address. As he made this announcement, the President warned: “I will not hesitate to take action against Isil in Syria as well as Iraq”.

The air strikes came at the request of the Iraqi government, which was struggling to battle Isis militants advancing across swathes of the country.

Syria

Then, on the 22 September, the President lived up to his warning and the Pentagon announced the US had launched air strikes on the Isis stronghold Raqqa and on the Khorasan Group in Aleppo.

The Pentagon spokesman Rear Adm John Kirby said fighter jets, bombers and Tomahawk cruise missiles were fired from ships in the region during the strikes.

In a statement, the US military said it had "destroyed or damaged multiple (Isis) targets" around the cities of Raqqa, Deir al-Zor, Hasakah and the border town of Albu Kamal.

Fake News - The ultimate psyops and weapon of the socialists to control the nations

Donald Trump, the U.S. president is promoting financing to the operations in South America of mercenaries to kidnap and murder the leftist leaders and drug traffickers to impose a geopolitical projection under the legality of mutual help between the countries' governments that support his government program and are aligned to the U.S. politics. John Bolton promoted the projection through the Mercosul Countries to receive the military supporting by the local armies.

The program is a part of military operation based on the previous Operation Condor, backed military and paramilitary action against the leftists, repressing a state-terror involving military intelligence, infiltration and assassination.

The affirmative comes when Guaidó appeared to be under the siege of Venezuelan government hijacking the media and promote social unrest in Venezuela and a migration crisis in the country. According to local media, the promotion of kidnaps make the politics to mask their own military operations and blame in the local opposition governments, with the possible murdering, also, of allied of the U.S. government, to raise a political instability.

The use of technology for the spread of anti-leftist propaganda and the contract of private publicity companies, is a strategy for the right government to promote anti-right propaganda, raising a insecure scenarium and justify a police state and military presence in South America, with the idea of protect the nation state of the international menaces of Russian presence and possible terrorist groups in South America.

Another part this operation plan of Neonconservative politics is use the private military companies in Brazil and Colombia's borders to siege the Russian mercenary presence and control the routes of the weapons, that comes from Argentina to the international weapon traffick.

The rhetoric information and fake news is a program of dialectics, where the hability of promotion of psyops and fake propaganda are spread in media by the leftist governments. This affirmative above is FAKE, totally non-logical, but readers at the first moment formulate possible scenarios in their heads. But it's a kind of disinformation that media tries to spread all the time, criminalizing right wings' actions in mask of their own actions, the finance of criminal organizations.

Trump didn't and don't hire mercenaries to the South America, but Obama and Clinton did...

If the affirmative above was promoting a possible 'mercenary action financed by Obama or leftist governments', the whole media could attack and promote a legal proccess to criminalize the vehicle.

Obama financed the Islamic State, as many other leftist governments financed the criminal organizations in South America, promoting decades of terror and instability and corruption, but media hide this informations, as promoted by the left financed The Intercept and mediatic vehicled financed by the George Soros' Open Society, and promotes a victimization of the leftists to legitimate their actions.

Left wings promoted criminal activities alongside of the continent, the unification of criminal groups from Brazil, Venezuela, Colombia and Peru, aligned with international weapon and drug traffickers, promoted deacades of political stoppage and corruption and a less number of right capitalist parties in South America for two decades almost.

Brazilain parties financed a terrorist attack for the assassination of the right wing president candidate Bolsonaro. Guaidó is hijacked by Maduro's government as a criminal, illegaly the government took his political rights and civilian rights, just for think of nationalism and right politics and democracy. South American governments are all influenced by Foro de São Paulo and leftist media, that promotes cultural marxism and social unrest, and social pathologies with intention to limitate the thinking capacity of population, and than, manipulate the opinions, with the multipolarization of society in different minorities fighting legally for their own interests and not thinking collective.

The program os spread fake news is an old program promoted by governments intelligence infiltrating fake data in media and put the right wing as the enemy of society, and put on the left wing as the savior of the inner thoughts, minorities - hiding also that the greatest corruption cases in politics comes from the leftists from South America, backed by Cuban State and Foro de São Paulo, hiding in NGOs and other organisms the public money detoured from the social steps of education and public security.

This program comes from the left wing intelligence promoted by a Frankfurtian Scholar of marginalization of society and the anti-'heroe' as the messiah of the society. Where the society must not act for the collective, but go to the wrong side of the way to promote a perpetual power of the communism;

There is also a problem with social media, and the spread of terrorist and other kind of propaganda, that is hard to fight back. This promotion of the pro and anti freedom os speech is promoted by secret government operations that creates profiles to promote propaganda and search and seek the agents, or civilians, involved with extremist ideologies.

This part of the covert operations is a part of social engineering, and tthe possibility of take control of the whole media agents.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2018/10/09/can-we-finally-stop-terrorists-from-exploiting-social-media/#3091cd446d80

But now, the focus is to find the ultra nationalist propaganda, and take down the non-global ideologies, promoted by Evolians and new Evolians. The covert operations are more strategic than tactical nowadays, promoted by non governamental agents at the most part, so the use of mercenaries or spies, or hitmen are still the most used.

Facebook, Whatsapp and Instagram are tools to use the fake news to spread over the brainwashed population causing disburbance at the mutual and human relations in society, comming to a reality, the capability of manipulate the opinions over politicians, raise hate for unequals, and create a possible enemy between society and another nation.

Other part are the private companies that are able to steal important data and private numbers to promote spread of disinformation. Stealing data of personal inscripts, e-mails, and access to credit cards and bank accounts, formulating polices for bank controlling and money lend, making, society, slaves of debts.

Use of fake news is the ultimate psyops of governments and the society is under control of musical influence of leftist financers, legally, and a law that freezes the possibility of 'rise against' for upheaval and, also, cowardly take the capability of defense with the gun control. And cowardly the criminalization of the individual thinking against the left governments.

Half of Americans see fake news as bigger threat than terrorism, study finds
Almost 70% of Americans feel fake news has greatly affected their confidence in government institutions, a new study says

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jun/06/fake-news-how-misinformation-became-the-new-front-in-us-political-warfare

s the US gears up for its next general election, half of Americans view fake news as a bigger threat to the country than terrorism, illegal immigration, violent crime or racism, according to a new study.

The 2016 presidential race was widely regarded as a wake-up call to the spectre of foreign influence, following what the US government concluded was a “systematic” Russian campaign to undermine its democratic process. But under the Trump presidency, fake news and misinformation has also grown into a new front in US political warfare.

The result, according to the study by the Pew Research Center, is that almost 70% of Americans feel fake news and misinformation have greatly affected their confidence in government institutions, and experts warn of a deepening crisis if the status quo is left unchecked.

“I think we will rue the day when we don’t step up,” Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate intelligence committee, told the Guardian in an interview. “The platform companies – Facebook, Twitter, Google – are alert to the fact that there’s a problem, and they have taken firm actions of self-policing.”

“But from a guardrails or rules-of-the-road standpoint, remarkably we’ve done nothing.”

A host of top 2020 Democratic presidential contenders have recently been the targets of content that, despite being false, has been widely shared across social media. A doctored video of the House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, misleadingly edited to suggest her speech was impaired or was perhaps drunk, was disseminated by Donald Trump and ratcheted up millions of views on Facebook before the company belatedly took action to demote, but not remove it.

“The impact of made-up news goes beyond exposure to it and confusion about what is factual,” said Amy Mitchell, the group’s director of journalism research. “Americans see it influencing the core functions of our democratic system.”

The proliferation of the Pelosi videos and other falsified political content reminds us of the 2016 cycle, when rightwing conspiracy theories about Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s health and mental fitness were amplified by doctored content online. Russian-led efforts to swing the election in Trump’s favor made use of fake advertising and videos to sow discord in the US by seizing on divisive issues that included race relations, immigration and gun rights.

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s 448-page thoroughly detailed how the Russians set up fake social media accounts to spread misinformation that reached “tens of millions of US persons”.

But despite hauling executives at tech giants Google, Facebook and Twitter to Capitol Hill to testify before Congress on a handful of occasions, lawmakers in Washington have yet to take concrete action.

Facebook was criticized for being slow to respond to the altered Pelosi videos, and some questioned if it was effective to simply demote the content and make it more difficult to find.

Meanwhile several Democratic presidential contenders have had to weather their own headlines in a fake news cycle: A fake image purported to show a blackface doll on Senator Elizabeth Warren’s desk; a series of sensationalized stories circulated about Kamala Harris’s relationship with a former male colleague; and the South Bend mayor, Pete Buttigieg, was falsely accused of sexual misconduct in a story that amounted to a hoax. And we are still 18 months away from the actual election.

Sarah Miller, the deputy director of Open Markets, said it was insufficient to expect social media companies to self-regulate in an environment where their businesses were based on surveillance and data mining.

“It’s the fundamental business model of Facebook and Google to promote content that is sensationalistic and engaging, whether or not it is responsible content,” she said.

Miller said federal lawmakers must push for breaking up Facebook and reversing its acquisitions of other popular social networking apps Whatsaspp and Instagram.

“Since Facebook has monopoly status in the market, users have no power to drive market-based accountability,” she said. “If government doesn’t step in, then I don’t see anything fundamentally changing.”

“It’s a systemic issue,” Miller added, “and Congress has the authority to change it.”

Warner said there was bipartisan agreement that the social media platforms must be reined in, but he acknowledged a lack of consensus on how far to go.

Warner, who is working on legislation to address these issues, said solutions could range from regulating digital campaign advertisements by online companies such as Facebook and Google, identity validation and geo-locators to more clearly distinguish between bots and real people, and increased transparency around how consumer data is used by social media platforms.

“I don’t think anybody’s fully figured this out. I think the platforms have been very slow to react,” said Warner, while adding the Pelosi video underscored the complexity of identifying outright fake content versus altered material.

“If you simply put a thumbs down or a small icon that indicates this is fake, and you can cut out the icon and still deliver it on a wide basis, the bad guys are going to be successful,” he said.

As the US mulls a commensurate response, its counterparts in Europe have paved the way for enforcing privacy rights and better protecting consumer data through the implementation of policies such as GDPR. The European commission has also issued a warning to Facebook, Google and Twitter to amplify its tactics to fight fake news or risk being hit with more heavy-handed regulations.

Recent data shows that more than half of internet traffic comes from bots, and that the misinformation epidemic has expanded to fake polling, fake fundraisers and fake thinktanks.

Last week, Facebook said it had removed a record 2.2 billion fake accounts in its first quarter of 2019. Although the company did not attribute the fake accounts to a specific country, group or entity, Guy Rosen, Facebook’s vice-president of integrity, said: “The larger quantities of fake accounts are driven by spammers who are constantly trying to evade our systems.”

Socialism to be succeed must promote the corrpution of the youth by it's vices. Promote legallity in drugs and destroy the core of the relations. Socialism also controls the media and make up the news promoting a welfare state and by other means goes controlling and perpetual power, limitating society at it's capability of rise against or even vote.

REX 84 - The code-law to put world under total control

Rex 84: FEMA’s Blueprint for Martial Law in America

https://www.globalresearch.ca/rex-84-fema-s-blueprint-for-martial-law-in-america/3010

This incisive article on the repeal of civil liberties first published by Global Research in August 2006, brings to forefront of debate the ongoing road map towards Police State in America. It of particular significance with regard to the nomination of William Barr to the position of Attorney General.

(M.Ch, GR Editor)

***

We are dangerously close to a situation where ~ if the American people took to the streets in righteous indignation or if there were another 9/11 ~ a mechanism for martial law could be quickly implemented and carried out under REX 84.  

The Cheney/Bush administration has a plan which would accommodate the detention of large numbers of American citizens during times of emergency.

The plan is called REX 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984. Through Rex-84 an undisclosed number of concentration camps were set in operation throughout the United States, for internment of dissidents and others potentially harmful to the state.

The Rex 84 Program was originally established on the reasoning that if a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border, they would be quickly rounded up and detained in detention centers by FEMA.

Existence of the Rex 84 plan was first revealed during the Iran-Contra Hearings in 1987, and subsequently  reported by the Miami Herald on July 5, 1987

” These camps are to be operated by FEMA should martial law need to be implemented in the United States and all it would take is a presidential signature on a proclamation and the attorney general’s signature on a warrant to which a list of names is attached.”

And there you have it ~ the real purpose of FEMA is to not only protect the government but to be its principal vehicle for martial law.

This is why FEMA could not respond immediately to the Hurricane Katrina disaster ~ humanitarian efforts were no longer part of its job description under the Department of Homeland Security.

It appears Hurricane Katrina also provided FEMA with an excuse to “dry run” its unconstitutional powers in New Orleans, rounding up “refugees” (now called “evacuees”) and “relocating” them in various camps. “Some evacuees are being treated as ‘internees’ by FEMA,” writes former NSA employee Wayne Madsen.

“Reports continue to come into WMR that evacuees from New Orleans and Acadiana [the traditional twenty-two parish Cajun homeland] who have been scattered across the United States are being treated as ‘internees’ and not dislocated American citizens from a catastrophe“

We are dangerously close to a situation where ~ if the American people took to the streets in righteous indignation or if there were another 9/11 ~ a mechanism for martial law could be quickly implemented and carried out under REX 84.

Be forewarned ~ the Cheney/Bush administration will stop at nothing to preserve their power and their ongoing neocon mis-adventure and they have currently proposed having executive control over all the states National Guard troops  in a national emergency.

Governor Tom Vilsack of Iowa, called the proposal ” one step away from a complete takeover of the National Guard, the end of the Guard as a dual-function force that can respond to both state and national needs.”

The provision was tucked into the House version of the defense bill without notice to the states, something Vilsack said he resented as much as the proposal itself.

Under the provision, the president would have authority to take control of the Guard in case of  ” a serious natural or manmade disaster, accident or catastrophe” in the United States.

Do remember, to the Cheney/Bush administration ~ the Mob at the Gates that they truly fear is not terrorists but, instead, the people demanding the truth.

REX 84 AND FEMA

http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2004/FEMA-Concentration-Camps3sep04.htm

MINDFULLY, 2004 – There over 800 prison camps in the United States, all fully operational and ready to receive prisoners. They are all staffed and even surrounded by full-time guards, but they are all empty. These camps are to be operated by FEMA should martial law need to be implemented in the United States and all it would take is a presidential signature on a proclamation and the attorney general’s signature on a warrant to which a list of names is attached. . . The Rex 84 Program was established on the reasoning that if a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border, they would be quickly rounded up and detained in detention centers by FEMA.

Rex 84 allowed many military bases to be closed down and to be turned into prisons.

Operation Cable Splicer and Garden Plot are the two sub programs which will be implemented once the Rex 84 program is initiated for its proper purpose. Garden Plot is the program to control the population. Cable Splicer is the program for an orderly takeover of the state and local governments by the federal government.

FEMA is the executive arm of the coming police state and thus will head up all operations. The Presidential Executive Orders already listed on the Federal Register also are part of the legal framework for this operation.

The camps all have railroad facilities as well as roads leading to and from the detention facilities. Many also have an airport nearby. The majority of the camps can house a population of 20,000 prisoners.

Currently, the largest of these facilities is just outside of Fairbanks, Alaska. The Alaskan facility is a massive mental health facility and can hold thousands of  people.

The original source of this article is Salon.com Blogs and Global Research

Copyright © Allen L Roland, Salon.com Blogs and Global Research, 2019

US FEMA Detainment Camps

https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-fema-camps/7763?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles

Article originally published by the Geopolitical Monitor on the 20th of September 2007 and cross-posted by GR on January 10, 2008.

Contents

1. Executive Summary

2. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

3. Powers and Preparations for a Declared State of Emergency

4. Detainment Camps

5. End Notes

1.    Executive Summary

The United States Federal Emergency Management Agency has numerous detainment camps throughout the United States. Some camps have been recently constructed and / or renovated and are fully staffed. The existence of the camps coupled with Presidential Executive Orders giving the President and Department of Homeland Security (of which FEMA is now part) control over ‘national essential functions’ in the event of ‘catastrophic emergency’ have resulted in concerns that the camps will be used to forcefully detain American citizens for unconstitutional purposes.

2.     Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

History

FEMA was created on April 1, 1979 pursuant to President Jimmy Carter’s Executive Order 12127. It amalgamated the Federal Insurance Administration, the National Fire Prevention and Control Administration, the National Weather Service Community Preparedness Program, the Federal Preparedness Agency and the Federal Disaster Assistance Administration activities formerly carried out by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. It also took over Civil Defense from the Department of Defense, which was in charge of preparing citizens for military attack. [1]

In 1993 Bill Clinton turned the directorship of FEMA into a Cabinet position. In 2003 FEMA became part of the Department of Homeland Security’s Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate. [2]

       Stated Purpose

The stated purpose of FEMA is to “reduce the loss of life and property and protect the Nation from all hazards, including natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other man-made disasters, by leading and supporting the nation in a risk-based, comprehensive emergency management system of preparedness, protection, response, recovery, and mitigation.” [3]

Recent Operations

FEMA’s most notable large-scale operation in recent times was in the aftermath of August 2005 hurricane Katrina, which occurred along the north-central Gulf Coast, particularly affecting New Orleans, Louisiana. FEMA’s response to the disaster was widely criticized due to a slow and inadequate response, blocking external private and public assistance from individuals and groups including the Red Cross, [4] banning photographs of the dead [5] and confiscating reporter’s equipment [6] and homeowner’s registered firearms. [7]

The 2006 Congressional report on FEMA’s handling of Katrina stated that it was “… a national failure, an abdication of the most solemn obligation to provide for the common welfare,” [8]

       Criticisms

Some have criticized FEMA’s failure as being due to is focus on ‘civil defense’ continuity of government and terrorism response programs to the detriment of its natural disaster response readiness. It is further alleged that hurricane Katrina was used to test run of a continuity of government program, allowing FEMA to rehearse rounding up and relocating large numbers of people to camps, suspending their constitutional rights and militarizing the region [9] with the help of private military contractors (mercenaries). Black Water USA, a private security company, was used in the aftermath of Katrina. [10]

3.     Powers and Preparations for a Declared State of Emergency

       REX-84 and Operation Garden Plot

Readiness Exercise 1984 (REX-84) is an emergency response program involving the implementation of martial law, the movement of civilian populations and the arrest and detainment of segments of the population. A rehearsal of the program was carried out April 5-13, 1984. It was led by FEMA and the Department of Defense and involved the coordination of 34 other Federal departments and agencies. [11] REX-84 was mentioned during the Iran-Contra hearings [12] and publicly exposed by the Miami Herald on Sunday July 5th, 1987. [13]

Similar large-scale emergency preparedness drills have taken place regularly since then. The most recently announced, organized by NORTHCOM, are scheduled for October 15-20. [14] Some assert that the drills continue to include preparations for the suspension of the Constitution and the implementation of martial law. [15]

Operation Garden Plot is a United States Army and National Guard program under control of the US Northern Command (NORTHCOM) to provide Federal military support during domestic civil disturbances. One example of the program’s implementation was during the 1992 Los Angeles riots when US Army and Marine forces were used in conjunction with the California National Guard. [16] In Los Angeles an Executive Order was made to permit the use of the Federal army to uphold domestic laws pursuant to the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act, which places restrictions on the domestic use of the military for law enforcement purposes. [17]

Recently, however, Section 1076 Public Law 109-364, or the “John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007” (H.R.5122) has amended Posse Comitatus and The Insurrection Act (which also places limits on domestic military deployment) to allow the Federal government to unilaterally take control of state National Guards and position Federal troops anywhere in the country during a ‘public emergency’. [18]

       Executive Orders

Throughout the 1960s numerous Presidential Executive Orders were issued authorizing Federal agencies to take over essential functions in the case of a declared emergency. The powers include, among many others, the authority of the Federal government to take over transportation infrastructure including highways and seaports (10990), food resources and farms (10998) and mobilize citizens into government supervised work brigades (11000). [19]

Rex 84: FEMA’s Blueprint for Martial Law in America

On May 9, 2007 President George Bush reasserted the role of the Federal government during a declared emergency by issuing Executive Order NSPD 51/ HSPD-20. The Order states that in the event of a ‘catastrophic emergency’ all ‘national essential functions’ may be taken over by the Executive branch of government and the Department of Homeland Security (including FEMA). [20]

4.     Detainment Camps

       Developments and Construction

In August 2002, then Attorney General John Ashcroft called for American citizens who are deemed ‘enemy combatants’ to be detained indefinitely without charge and independently of the judiciary. [21] This legal position was upheld in the case of a US citizen detained abroad by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a January 2003 ruling. [22]

In October 2006 the Military Commissions Act was passed by Congress. [23] The legislation applies to non-US citizens and permits individuals labeled as ‘enemy combatants’ to be imprisoned indefinitely and without charge. It also denies non-military tribunal judicial review of detainment (Section 7), disregards international treaties such as the Geneva Convention, and states that it is the President who defines what constitutes torture (Sections 5 & 6).

In January of 2007 the American Civil Liberties Union released a report based on documents obtained by a Freedom of Information Act suit showing that the Pentagon had monitored at least “186 anti-military protests in the United States and collected more than 2,800 reports involving Americans in an anti-terrorist threat database.” [24]

For some time FEMA has been renovating and constructing new detention camps throughout the country. In January 2006 Haliburton subsidiary KBR announced that it had been awarded an “indefinite delivery / indefinite quantity contract to construct detention facilities for the Department of Homeland Security worth a maximum of $385 million over 5 years. [25]

       Stated Purpose

Little has been said about the purpose of the detainment camps but when official comment has been made it has stated that the camps are for the temporary detainment of illegal immigrants. [26]

Quantity and Locations

Citizens who are concerned about the purpose and potential use of the detainment camps have documented and, when possible, filmed the detainment facilities. A current estimate of the number of detainment camps is over 800 located in all regions of the United States with varying maximum capacities. [27] If one includes government buildings currently used for other purposes the number is far greater. Video of renovated but empty detainment camps has also been released. [28]

5.    End Notes

[1] Executive Order 12127–Federal Emergency Management Agency

http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/eo/eo-12127.htm.

[2] Federal Emergency Management Agency. “About FEMA” April 1, 2007 <http://www.fema.gov/about/history.shtm>.

[3] Ibid.

[4]  Federal Emergency Management Agency. News Release. “First Responders Urged Not To Respond To Hurricane Impact Areas Unless Dispatched By State, Local

Authorities” 29 August 2005  http://www.fema.gov/news/newsrelease.fema?id=18470;

Rodgers, Ann. “Homeland Security won’t let Red Cross deliver food” Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. 3 September 2005 <http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05246/565143.stm;

Zarend-Kubatko, Jill. “Disaster touches area residents” Valley Life. 2 September 2005 http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=15147862&BRD=>.

[5] Editorandpublisher.com. “Journalist Groups Protest FEMA Ban on Photos of Dead” 7

September 2005 http://www.mediainfo.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001055768>.

[6] Gebauer, Matthias. “The Eye of the Hurricane” Spiegel Online International.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/0,1518,373590,00.html>.

[7] Berenson, Alex and Timothy Williams. “New Orleans Begins Confiscating Firearms as Water Recedes” New York Times. 8 September 2005 http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/08/national/nationalspecial

08cnd-storm.html?ex=1189483200&en=b7a5f1efcf668506&ei=5070>.

[8] Cable News Network (CNN). “Report: Katrina response a ‘failure of leadership’:

Homeland Security secretary described as ‘detached’” 14 February 2006

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/13/katrina.congress/index.html?iref=newssearch>.

[9] Nimmo, Kurt. “Attacks on democratic rights, breaching legal barriers: FEMA and

Katrina: REX-84 Revisited” Global Research. 11 September 2005 www.//globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=NIM20050911&articleId=929>.

[10] Scahill, Jeremy. “In the Black(water)” The Nation. 22 May 2006

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060605/scahill>.

[11] Reynolds, Diana. “The Rise of the National Security State: FEMA and the NSC.” Publiceye.org. 1990 <http://www.publiceye.org/liberty/fema/Fema_1.html>.

[12] “Suspension of American Constitution Oliver North.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8tQAYYtLok&mode=related&search=>.

[13] Chardy, Alfonso. “Reagan Aides and the ‘Secret’ Government.” The Miami Herald. 5 July 1987 http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/secret_white_house_plans.htm>.

[14] United States Northern Command. “Exercise Vigilant Shield ’08 slated for October.” 30 August 2007 http://www.northcom.mil/News/2007/083007.html>.

[15] Rogers, Lee. “NORTHCOM Plans 5 Day Martial Law Exercise.” Intel Strike. 5 September 2007 http://intelstrike.com/?p=57>.

[16] Global Security. “Operation Garden Plot JTF-LAJoint Task Force Los Angeles”<http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/jtf-la.htm>.

[17] Morales, Frank. “U.S. Military Civil Disturbance Planning:

The War At Home” Covert Action Quarterly, #69 Spring / Summer 2000. http://cryptome.org/garden-plot.htm>.

[18] Morales, Frank. “Bush Moves Towards Martial Law” Toward Freedom. 26 October 2006 <http://www.towardfreedom.com/home/content/view/911/>.

[19] Anonymous. “FEMA Concentration Camps: Locations and Executive Orders” Friends of Liberty. http://www.sianews.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1062>.

[20] The White House. “Presidential Directive NSPD 51, HSPD-20.” 9 May 2007 <http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html>.

[21] Turley, Jonathan. “Camps for Citizens: Ashcroft’s Hellish Vision” Los Angeles Times. 14 August 2002 <http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0814-05.htm>.

[22] Cable News Network (CNN). “Americans may be held as ‘enemy combatants,’ appeals court rules.” 8 January 2003 http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/01/08/enemy.combatants>.

[23] The Library of Congress. Military Commissions Act of 2006. 17 October 2007 http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:S.3930:>.

[24] American Civil Liberties Union. “ACLU Report Shows Widespread Pentagon Surveillance of Peace Activists” Press Release. 17 January 2007 http://www.aclu.org/safefree/spyfiles/28024prs20070117.html>.

[25] Halliburton Public Relations “KBR Awarded U.S. Department of Homeland Security Contingency Support Project for Emergency Support Services.” 24 January 2006 http://www.kbr.com/news/2006/govnews_060124.aspx>.

[26] Ibid.

Scott, Peter Dale. “Homeland Security Contracts for Vast New Detention Camps.” New America Media. 8 February 2006 http://news.pacificnews.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=eed74d9d44c30493706fe03f4c9b3a77>.

[27] Friends of Liberty “FEMA Concentration Camps: Locations and Executive Orders.”

http://www.sianews.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1062>.

[28] FEMA Camp Footage (Concentrations Camps in USA). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0P-hvPJPTi4.

The original source of this article is GeopoliticalMonitor.com

Copyright © Geopolitical Monitor, GeopoliticalMonitor.com, 2016

F.E.M.A. The construction of a world cemetery

http://www.globalistagenda.org/governmentMore.htm

Tyranny is HERE! The grim future foretold in 1984 has become reality. The United States is now recognized globally as one of the most oppressive police states on earth. And it's only getting worse. POLICE STATE 4 chronicles the sickening depths to which our republic has fallen. Veteran documentary filmmaker Alex Jones conclusively proves the existence of a secret network of FEMA camps, now being expanded nationwide. The military industrial complex is transforming our once free nation into a giant prison camp. A cashless society control grid, constructed in the name of fighting terrorism, was actually built to enslave the American people. Body scanners, sound cannons, citizen spies, staged terror and cameras on every street corner -- it's only the beginning of the New World Order's hellish plan. This film exposes how the "Continuity of Government" program has established an all powerful shadow state. Prepare to enter the secretive world of emergency dictatorship, FEMA camps, and a shredded Constitution. Witness police and military savagely attacking innocent citizens as our own government unleashes false flag operations to justify its oppression. Then watch as Alex Jones takes on corrupt mercenary police and exposes mainstream media brainwashing.

The Globalist Purge: UN Invasion, Martial Law, Walmart Closings, & FEMA Camps

https://www.opdeepstate.com/2019/05/27/the-globalist-purge-un-invasion-martial-law-walmart-closings-fema-camps/

It has been long in the making… Executive orders – from the time of Reagan to Obama have made it more and more of a reality today. We have seen glimpses of it during Hurricanes Katrina and Harvey – during Martial law training exercises, such as JadeHelm15. Evidences of FEMA Prison camps popping up all over the country, the militarization of police, the invasive procedures of intelligence services using the latest in A.I. technology… the list goes on and on.

There is an invasion of America happening as we speak, and they have traded in the red coats and white wigs, for white trucks and blue helmets. Join us, in this new documentary series produced by the Black Banners of the East Satellite Channel – as we expose the nefarious globalist plan to enslave anyone who refuses their New World Order. Be a part of the Media Revolution — the Black Banners of the East is taking this information out of the arena of YouTube Conspiracy and broadcasting its truth to millions on Satellite T.V. Help us… Like. Subscribe. Share.

US Fema Concentration Camps in Case of Martial Law – Full List

https://globalpossibilities.org/us-fema-concentration-camps-in-case-of-martial-law-full-list/

May 05 2018 posted to Conspiracy Theories

Over 800 prison camps discovered in the United States! They are heavily guarded by the national guard full-time, but are empty all the time! These camps are being run by FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) should Martial Law take effect in the U.S. With just a simple order from President Donald Trump, Martial Law can be implemented, and he will remain, President in the White House, until it is over.

The Rex 84 Internment Camp Program

Which would mean he remains president indefinitely. The Rex 84 Camp Program, states. In an event which a “mass exodus” of Illegal immigrants flock over the border, they would be rounded up and sent to the FEMA camps. According to alternative news, the camps all have railroad connections, as well as roads and highways leading straight into them. Almost all also have an airport within a close distance to the camps. Most of the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s prison camps can house 20,000 plus people in warehouse buildings and are secured by the national guard. The biggest of all the camps, however, is located in Alaska and could house up to 2 million people. The same amount of all the people in Los Angles. Just ask yourself, do you want to be on Ashcroft’s list?

FEMA Concentration Camps debunked by Popular Mechanics?

Others claim these are fake news and tried to debunking FEMA camp myths as conspiracy theories. Glenn Beck also advocated conspiracy theories about the plan that the US government is planning to intern masses of people e.g. in case the evil depopulations ‘agenda 21‘ by the New World Order proceeds. He later backpedaled and hosted a segment featuring a guest from the science news website Popular Mechanics, who ‘debunked’ Glenn Becks own claims.

List of all U.S FEMA Camps

There is a camp close to the most major city’s in the U.S so transporting people would not be a problem. Special protocols and massive training events have put in place to prepare for an influx of people. This means you and your family could be sent to a camp in this event. Try and prepare for this as best you can by sitting down with your family you discuss a plan of action in this event.

Try to have at least one months supply of clean water and emergency food for everyone including pets. Research more on FEMA camps to learn more locations near you.

We, the preppers, must fight the new world order as best we can.

Alabama:

Opelika WWII German/Italian POW camp now being renovated.

Alaska:

Wilds of Alaska possibly East of Anchorage.

No access by road however, there is a railway system.

The facility holds 500,000 people.

Arizona:

Ft. Huachua, 20 miles from the Mexican border, 30 miles from Nogales. Rex 84 program. Emergency Custodial Facility.

Florence WWII German/Italian POW camp now being renovated.

Pinal County Gila River. Renovated WWII Japanese-American special internment detention facility.

Yuma County Colorado River. Renovated WWII Japanese-American special internment detention facility.

Arkansas:

Ft. Chaffee Has a new runway for aircraft, new detention camp facilities with cap of 20,000 prisoners.

Chicot/Drew Counties Jerome. Renovated spec Interment camps for Japanese Americans WWII.

Descha County Rohwer. Renovated WWII Japanese-American special internment detention centers.

Blythville AFB This base was closed but is now being used as a camp location. New wooden barracks have been constructed at this location. This camp is surrounded by high wire topped with barbed wire and has guard towers.

Berryville FEMA facility located east of Eureka on Hwy 62.

Omaha FEMA facility located on Hwy 65 south of old wood processing plant. It is on an old dirt road that leads to a toxic waste dump. Note: The facility in Miss. is also located on an old toxic waste dump.

California:

Oakdale Ca 90 miles East of San Francisco on HWY 120. Holds a minimum of 15,000 people. REX 84 program, Emergency Custodial Facility.

Vandenberg AFB Located midway between San Louis Obispo, and Santa Barbara. The base is on Hwy 1 and close to Hwy 101. REX 84 program, Emergency Custodial Facility.

Ft. Irwin Irwin is a remote Mtn region south of Death Valley, National Monument. This base is designated as inactive however, there is a concentration camp located at this facility about 30 miles from Interstate 15 in Barstow.

Inyo County Manzana. Renovated WWII Japanese-American special internment detention center.

Modoc County Tulelake. Renovated WWII Japanese-American special internment detention facility.

Sacramento Army Depot No specific data at this time.

Colorado:

Old Lowell AFB. Recently all new chain link fence was installed around the borders, plus 400,000 handcuffs and shackles were purchased by the government for this site.

Florida:

Avon Park No data available

Camp Krome Located near Miami Dept of Justice detention and interrogation facility.

Elgin AFB This base is greater than 50 miles long extending from Pensacola Bay to Hwy 331 in De Funiak Springs. It is adjacent to Interstate 10 on the North and the Fort Walton Beach vacation spot.

REX 84 program, Emergency Custodial Facility.

Georgia:

Ft. Benning Located East of Columbia near the Georgia/Alabama state line. – REX 84 program – Emergency Custodial Facility.

Unadilla, Ga Macon County; Located on east railroad street, Plunket road leads into the facility 1 1/2 miles from Unadilla on county road 230. This is a FEMA prison manned and staffed but no prisoners.

Oglethorpe, Ga. Macon County; the facility is located five miles from Montezuma, three miles from Oglethorp. Traveling south on highway 49, located on the west side of the highway. This FEMA prison has no staff and no prisoners.

Morgan, Ga. Calhoun County; I-75 exit 32 to 300 south to Albany. Take highway 234 to Morgan. Go through Morgan taking highway 45 south. The FEMA facility is 1 1/2 miles on the right (west) side of highway 45. This FEMA facility is fully manned and staffed but no prisoners.

Camilla, Ga. Mitchell County; from Camilla take highway 19 south, travel 5.4 miles from 37/19 junction to Mount Zion Road, turn left (east) on Mount Zion Road. The FEMA facility is located on Mount Zion Road aprox: 5.7 miles south of Camilla. This facility is not manned or staffed and there are no prisoners.

Hawkinsville, Ga Pulaski County; located on fire road 100/ Upper River Road, 2 miles west of alternate 129 North 257 / 112 east. Five miles east of Hawkensville. This FEMA facility is fully manned and staffed but no prisoners.

Abbeyville, Ga. Wilcox County: south side of Abbeyvilleon highway 129 (Broad Street) off highway 280 (Main Street). This FEMA facility is fully manned and staffed but no prisoners.

McRae, Ga. Telfair County; 1.5 miles west of McRae on highway 134 (8th street). The FEMA facility is on Irwinton Ave. off 8th street. This facility is fully manned and staffed but no prisoners.

Frequencies: 153.7400 Georgia State Correctional Institutions 154.9050 Intrastate Coordinating (car to car statewide) 154.9350 Intrastate Coordinating (base to base / statewide) 155.3700 Georgia Police Intersystem (statewide)

Idaho:

Jerome County – Minipoka – Renovated WWII Japanese-American special internment detention facility.

Kooski plus 50 miles East. Near Lolo pass

Moose Creek Unmanned and there is anearbyy landing strip in or near a national forest.

Illinois:

Marseilles It is located on the Illinois river off Interstate 80 on Hwy 6. It is a relatively small facility with a cap of 1400 prisoners.

Though it is small it is designed like other concentration camp facilities with high fences topped with barbed wire and guard towers.

Indiana:

Thousands of acres located just out of Indianapolis, Indiana holds a large Concentration camp facility complete with barracks, high fence, razor wire, towers, turnstyles, a railroad, helicopter landing pads, and what appears to be three large furnaces with 3inch mains on one of the buildings. This is a massive facility, still under construction with a completion date sometime in 1996.

Ft. Benjamin Harrison A U.S. Army facility located on the outskirts of Indianapolis will be used to hold prisoners.

Ft. Wayne FEMA Detention facility

Terre Haute FEMA Detention facility

Kansas:

Leavenworth U.S. Marshal’s Fed Holding Facility PFP.

Concordia WWII POW German/Italian POW camp being renovated.

El Dorado Federal prison.

Topeka 80 acres converted to a holding camp.

Kentucky:

Louisville FEMA Detention facility

Lexington FEMA Detention facility

Louisiana:

Livingston WWII German/Italian POW camp being renovated.

Maine:

Houlton WWII German/Italian POW camp being renovated.

Missouri:

Richards Gebaur AFB This facility is located in Grandview, A large civilian internment facility has been built on this facility, and base personnel are restricted from the area.

Michigan:

Kincheloe Correctional Facility (Formerly Kincheloe AFB with B-52 sized runways). Has five large prison buildings able to house 5000+. The facility has about 500 prisoners at this time. Location: 20 miles south of Sault Ste. Marie (Soo Locks) at the eastern end of the Upper Penninsula of Michigan.

K.I. Sawyer AFB Large construction program has been going on under the name of “Operation Gateway”. High security is in place with a large portion of the base closed to civilian view. Location: 20 miles south of Marquette, MI in the Upper Penninsula of Michigan.

Raco Field Raco field is an interesting facility. The above ground runways form a perfect triangle. Few buildings appear on the surface, but ventilators can be seen. Civilian workers report that a subsurface facility exists. No publicity exists indicating what the role of Raco Field is, although something is there. To observers, it is an “inactive WWII base.” Location: 15 miles NW of Kincheloe Correctional Facility on Hwy 28.

Bark River A large construction operation is ongoing in the Bark River, MI, area. Locals are tight-lipped. The facility is off the main highway in a wilderness area. While most of the locals say that the construction is associated with the ELF (extreme low frequency) project of world-wide communications, others suspect FEMA is involved. (Note: the ELF grid is located 100 miles NE of the Bark River area) Location: 20 miles west of Escanaba in the upper penninsula of Michigan.

Bay City Sits on Saginaw Bay which connects to Lake Huron. This facility has high fencing, barbed wire and guard towers.

Grayling Camp Grayling Michigan National Guard Base. Detention facility. Guards towers, razor wire.

Southwest area of the state FEMA Detention facility

Central part of the state FEMA Detention facility

Detroit FEMA Detention facility

Mississippi:

Hancock County – The NASA facility at this location has two camps the first being located at the end of Kiln road at Waveland, and then the next road after ammo road at the Post Office.

The second camp is located in the center of a rest station back from the Interstate.

Inmates from the Hancock County jail claim they have worked details involving the delivery of food to these camps under the supervision of U.N. Guards.

Nebraska:

Scottsbluff WWII German/Italian POW camp being renovated.

Northwest corner of state FEMA Detention facility

Northeast corner of state FEMA Detention facility

South Central Hastings area FEMA Detention facility

Nevada:

Elco There is a prison facility 10 miles out of Elco.

Wells Camp is located in the O’Niel basin area, 40 miles North of Wells, and West off Hwy 93, 25 miles.

Winnemucca Camp is located at the I-80 mile marker 112, on the south side of the road and 3/4 miles off of the road.

Wells/Winnemucca Camp is located near the base line of the mountains. Reno Nevada plus 150 miles east south side of road if your headed west, 150 yards off the road.

New Jersey:

Ft. Dix Fully operational prison camp with approximately 35,000 prisoners.

New York:

Ft. Drum located in upstate New York, probable location for Eastern area processing of people, located near the St. Lawrence river and access to Lake Ontario. Both waterways may be used for transport. Located very close to Canada.

Watertown FEMA Detention facility

Albany FEMA Detention facility

Buffalo FEMA Detention facility

Ohio:

Cleveland FEMA Detention facility

Columbus FEMA Detention facility

Cincinnati FEMA Detention facility

Lima FEMA Detention facility

Oklahoma:

Oklahoma City Tinker AFB, This is a civilian detention facility, all base personnel are prohibited from going near the area, and the area is under constant guard.

McAlester WWII German/Italian POW camp being renovated.

Will Rogers Air Port This is a newly constructed FEMA facility, and it is believed that it will be used as a primary processing center for prisoners West of the Mississippi River.

Pennsylvania:

Camp Hill Camp Hill Pa located off I-15. Sits across the navigable Susquehanna River from Harrisburg. Close to Cumberland Army Depot and the Camp Hill Correctional facility.

Crossville WWII German/Italian POW Camp being renovated.

Texas:

Ft.Hood Ft. Hood has a newly built concentration camp, constructed complete with towers, high fencing, and barbed wire.

Mexia WWII German/ Italian POW camp being renovated.

Amarillo FEMA Detention facility

Utah:

Millard County – Central Utah – Renovated WWII Japanese-American special internment detention facility.

Skull Valley Camp William property – west of the old bombing range South/southwestern portion of Camp Williams This camp was discovered by a man and his son who were rabbit hunting, they were discovered and apprehended.

Utah Lake 15 miles south of Saratoga Recreation center 200 – 300 yards off the road Black wire 40 to 50 feet tall, made to look something like a golf driving range.

Cedar City East of Cedar City Utah – no more data.

Washington:

Okanogan County borders Canada and is a site for a massive concentration camp capable of holding hundreds of thousands of people.

Wisconsin:

Ft. McCoy Located in Western Wisconsin 30 miles East of LaCrosse between the point where 90 and 94 intersect. REX 84 program, Emergency Custodial Facility.

Central part of the state FEMA Detention facility.

Wyoming:

Park County – Hart Mountain – Renovated WWII Japanese-American special internment detention facilities.

North Central part of the state FEMA Detention facility

Southeast part of the state FEMA Detention facility

Southwest part of the state FEMA Detention facility

East Yellowstone – Manned facility. Investigators were apprehended by European soldiers, unable to identify the language used by the foreign soldiers, American government helped clear the situation.