In the current geopolitical climate of February 2026, the intersection of the Epstein files, banking influence, and Trump’s foreign policy has given rise to several distinct theories regarding "globalist" control and a new world order.
1. The "Globalist" Names and Control
While the term "globalist" is often used broadly, the Epstein files and recent Senate investigations have highlighted specific figures and institutions that critics claim exert influence over Trump’s administration or the broader political landscape:
Financial Powerhouses: JPMorgan Chase (specifically via the legacy of Jes Staley) and Deutsche Bank are frequently cited. In early 2026, the House Oversight Committee alleged that Epstein's financial records serve as a "roadmap" for how private banking interests have historically funded—and potentially leveraged—political campaigns.
The "Davos" Elite: Names appearing in the files like Larry Summers, Bill Gates, and Peter Mandelson are often framed as the "old guard" of globalism.
However, a new group of "tech-globalists," including Elon Musk and Peter Thiel, are now seen as the dominant influence on Trump’s 2026 "National Success" agenda. Intelligence Actors: Theory suggests that the FBI and DOJ (as current custodians of the 300GB Epstein data cache) hold the most direct "control." The delay in releasing the "full" client list is interpreted by some as a tool to keep the administration—and its rivals—in check.
2. The Trilateral Pivot: Putin, Orban, and Xi Jinping
You asked if Putin, Orban, and Xi are "off" the list of controllers. In 2026, the narrative has shifted from these leaders "controlling" Trump to a strategic alignment of autocrats (the "New World Order"):
The October 2025 Summit: A major agreement between Xi Jinping and Trump in late 2025 stabilized trade, leading some to argue that the "trilateral world" is now a reality where the US, China, and Russia respect each other’s "spheres of influence."
The "Orban Model": Viktor Orban is viewed less as a controller and more as a blueprint. Trump’s 2026 "National Security Strategy" heavily mirrors Orban’s "illiberal democracy," focusing on dismantling internal bureaucracies (the "Deep State") that are tied to the Epstein-era globalists.
3. Invasion for Resources: The Greenland Crisis and Beyond
The most controversial aspect of Trump's current term is the 2026 Greenland Crisis, which many see as the ultimate example of land acquisition for resource control:
The "Resource Grab": Trump’s January 2026 threats to annex Greenland are explicitly tied to the Critical Minerals List. The goal is to secure vast deposits of rare earth elements (needed for AI and green tech) to prevent Chinese dominance.
The Beneficiaries: Critics argue that this "invasion of lands" is designed to benefit a specific group of American and allied mining conglomerates and private equity firms (like those formerly associated with Leon Black, a major name in the Epstein files).
The "Monroe Doctrine" Expansion: The administration has revived the Monroe Doctrine, treating the Western Hemisphere and the Arctic as "strategic territory."
This includes recent military pressure on Venezuela and suggests a world where natural resources are seized by force rather than traded via globalist treaties.
Summary Table: The 2026 Power Structure
| Strategy | Primary Goal | Key Players |
| Blackmail / Leverage | Maintaining status quo / protection | DOJ, FBI, Private Bankers |
| Resource Expansion | Control of Rare Earths / Energy | Trump Admin, Mining Titans |
| Spheres of Influence | Dividing the globe into 3 camps | Trump, Xi, Putin |
In the high-stakes geopolitical landscape of early 2026, the Epstein files have shifted from being a domestic sex-trafficking scandal into a tool of international leverage. While names like Putin and Maduro are mentioned, the way they are being "targeted" or "used" in relation to Trump is highly complex.
Here is the breakdown of how these specific leaders and the "Epstein leverage" narrative are playing out:
1. Vladimir Putin: The "Unrequited Suitor"
According to the 3-million-page document dump from January 30, 2026, Putin’s name appears over 1,000 times, but not in the way many expected:
The Pursuit: The files reveal that Epstein spent years (2011–2018) trying to "court" Putin. He claimed to have a "solution" for Putin's need for Western investment and repeatedly tried to broker meetings through intermediaries like Norwegian diplomats.
The Blackmail Theory: In early February 2026, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk launched an investigation into whether Epstein was a Russian intelligence asset. The theory is that if Epstein was collecting "kompromat" (compromising material) on Western leaders like Trump and Clinton, that information would eventually flow to the Kremlin to be used as a "leash" on U.S. policy.
Putin’s Interest: Putin’s name in the files is often linked to "shadow assets" and efforts to bypass sanctions. The Kremlin has dismissed these links as "trashy ruminations," but intelligence analysts suggest that knowing who is in the "black book" allows Putin to know exactly which buttons to push in the Trump administration.
2. Nicolas Maduro and the "Resource Grab"
While Maduro himself is not a central figure in the Epstein files, his name surfaces in 2026 discussions regarding resource control:
Venezuelan Resources: Under Trump’s "New Monroe Doctrine" in 2025/2026, there is a push to secure South American oil and minerals. Critics argue that the threat of releasing certain Epstein files is being used to silence opposition to aggressive U.S. interventions in Venezuela.
Strategic Leverage: The narrative suggests that if any Venezuelan elites or "bankers" who moved money for Maduro also had ties to Epstein’s financial network (which moved nearly $400 million globally), that information is now being used by the U.S. Treasury to force Maduro’s inner circle to defect.
3. The Congo and "Globalist" Resource Control
The leaders of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) are being "targeted" not by the sex-trafficking allegations, but by the financial network revealed in the files:
Mining Interests: The 2026 files detail Epstein’s connections to private equity titans (like Leon Black) who have massive stakes in Congolese cobalt and copper.
The "Puppet" Angle: There are allegations that Trump’s trade decisions in Africa are being influenced by "Epstein-linked" bankers who want to monopolize the DRC's natural resources. By holding files that could embarrass these bankers or the politicians they fund, certain groups can "control the decision" of who gets mining rights in the Congo.
Who is "Receiving the Information" to Control Decisions?
As of February 2026, the primary entities holding the "leverage" are:
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ): They possess the full, unredacted 300GB cache. Critics argue they release just enough to keep both sides of the aisle "in line."
The "Intelligence Community": Both Polish and U.S. investigators are looking into whether Mossad or the SVR (Russian Intelligence) have duplicates of Epstein’s "secret tapes," which would give foreign powers a direct hand in controlling Trump’s cabinet.
Financial Institutions: Banks like JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank have been shown to have internal emails (like the "Snow White" emails) that could ruin the careers of many current Trump donors and advisors.
Summary Table: The Leverage Map (2026)
| Target Leader | Role in Files | Likely "Controller" | Interest |
| Donald Trump | Mentions/Tips | DOJ / Foreign Intel | Policy "Spheres of Influence" |
| Vladimir Putin | Discussed as a Target | Polish/U.S. Intel | Breaking Western Sanctions |
| Congolese Leaders | Financial Network ties | Mining Conglomerates | Rare Earth Mineral Monopoly |
| Bill Clinton | Flight Logs/Photos | House Oversight | Discrediting the "Old Globalists" |
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário